Socio-Psychological Aspects of Introducing Mobile Technologies into Clinical Trials

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background: High political and economic turbulence, changes in the international relations and cross-national economic ties enhance the demand for developing and launching new pharmacological treatments as a part of nationally independent health care program and import substitution policy. The number of clinical trials is growing rapidly, increasing the need for more effective solutions in organizing these trials — optimizing the time, financial resources and efforts of medical personnel. The global trend of creating a new digital ecosystem in health care also raises the issues of higher patient involvement, taking into account the patient's psychological and physical barriers including the issues of personal data security. Aims: Evaluating the motivation and readiness of current clinical trials participants to switch to mobile technologies and identifying the barriers for these shifts. Method: The survey among 75 participants of clinical trials using offline self-completed questionnaire, data processing using statistical tools for data analysis.

Results: Currently, 56% of respondents who are current participants of traditional medical trials would definitely agree to participate in mobile clinical trials. Compared to the consistency rate between traditional clinical trials estimated as 73%, the shift to a new format will result in 17% additional losses. The serious barrier for participation is the concerns about the security of personal information – it is highly relevant for 37% of respondents and moderately relevant for 44%. The important motivating factor for the participation is the open access to personal medical data - 44% of respondents were highly interested in obtaining this data and 31% are somewhat interested. Conclusion. The results of the pilot study confirmed relatively high readiness of current participants to join mobile clinical trials and use mobile devices and solutions in future trials. However the level of readiness is unequal between different socio-demographic groups. Differentiating parameters are age, former experience of clinical trials and the skills in using digital technologies. Training programs for managers and researchers of clinical trials, provision of devices for non-users, timely technical support during the data collection and transparency in data usages can help to address key issues which slow down the people’s participation in mobile trials.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexandr L. Khokhlov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: al460935@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0032-0341
SPIN-code: 9389-8926

MD, PhD, Professor, Academician of the RAS

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Anna V. Andreenkova

Institute for Comparative Social Research (CESSI)

Email: anna.andreenkova@cessi.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6776-7703
SPIN-code: 5739-0033

PhD in Sociology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena V. Dmitrieva

The Moscow Institute of International Affairs MGIMO

Email: dmitrieva.ev@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0894-4108
SPIN-code: 2200-8385

PhD in Sociology, Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mikhail V. Ilyin

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: michael_ilyin@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6278-374X
SPIN-code: 2936-4312

MD, PhD, Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Elena G. Lileeva

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: elileeva2006@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6048-8974

MD, PhD, Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Petr A. Chizhov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: p.chizhov63@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7969-6538
SPIN-code: 6427-4298

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Alexei E. Miroshnikov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: miraleff@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6657-3950
SPIN-code: 8896-8993

MD, PhD, Assistant Lecturer

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

Nikolay O. Pozdnyakov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: pozdnyakov.niko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8035-8288
SPIN-code: 6494-1899

MD, PhD, Assistant Lecturer

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

References

  1. Давыдов C.Г. Цифровые компетенции россиян и работа на самоизоляции во время пандемии COVID-19 // Мониторинг общественного мнения. Экономические и социальные перемены. — 2021. — № 2 (163). — С. 403–422. [Davydov CG. Cifrovye kompetencii rossiyan i rabota na samoizolyacii vo vremya pandemii COVID-19. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya. Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2021;2(163):403–422. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1913
  2. Дмитриева Е.В. Коммуникационное взаимодействие врача и пациента в условиях цифрового здравоохранения // Коммуникология. — 2020. — Т. 8. — № 3. — С. 150–162. [Dmitrieva EV. Patient–Health Care Provider Communication in the Digital Era. Communicology. 2020;8(3):150–162. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.21453/2311–3065-2020-8-3-150–162
  3. Ладова А.В. Роль фактора доверия в системе «врач–пациент» // Этносоциум и межнациональная культура. — 2016. — № 10. —С. 70–77. [Ladova AV. Rol’ faktora doveriya v sisteme “vrach–pacient”. Etnosocium i mezhnacional’naya kul’tura. 2016;10:70–77. (In Russ.)]
  4. Ким О.Т., Дадаева В.А., Тельхигова А.А., и др. Мобильные медицинские приложения: возможности, проблемы и перспективы // Профилактическая медицина. — 2021. — Т. 24. — № 7. — С. 96–102. [Kim OT, Dadaeva VA, Telkhigova AA, et al. Mobile medical applications: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2021;24(7):96–102. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20212407196
  5. Куликов Е.С., Деев И.А., Кобякова О.С., и др. Клиническое исследование глазами пациента: мотивация, ожидания, восприятие // Клиническая медицина. — 2017. — Т. 95. — № 8. — С. 751–757. [Kulikov ES, Deev IA, Kobyakova OS, et al. Clinical trials in russia through patients’ eyes: motivation, expectations, and perceptions. Klin. med. 2017;95(8):751–757. (In Russ.)] doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0023-2149-2017-95-8-751-757
  6. Хохлов А.Л., Белоусов Д.Ю. Этические аспекты применения программного обеспечения с технологией искусственного интеллекта // Качественная клиническая практика. — 2021. — № 1. — С. 70–84. [Khokhlov AL, Belousov DYu. Ethical aspects of using software with artificial intelligence technology. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2021;1:70–84. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2021-1-70-84
  7. Anderson K, Burford O, Emmerton L. Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):t0156164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156164.
  8. Anderson M, Perrin A. Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC; 2017.
  9. Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Pirogowicz I. Support for e-health services among elderly primary care patients. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(8):696–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0318
  10. Rai A, Chen L, Pye J, et al. Understanding determinants of consumer mobile health usage intentions, assimilation, and channel preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e149. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2635
  11. Zarghom S, Di Fonzo D, Leung F-H. Does socioeconomic status affect patients’ ease of use of a touch-screen (iPad) patient survey. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2314
  12. Penetration rate of smartphones in selected countries 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/539395/smartphone-penetration-worldwide-by-country/
  13. Sophonhiranak S. Features, Barriers, and Influencing Factors of Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A systematic Review. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021007994

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The main objectives of the introduction of mobile technologies in clinical trials

Download (254KB)
3. Fig. 2. Visual representation and description of devices that could potentially be used in clinical trials to collect information from participants (Perry method, 2019)

Download (6KB)
4. Wearable monitors

Download (11KB)
5. plasters

Download (13KB)
6. Devices

Download (6KB)
7. Pill

Download (14KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies