MODERN APPROACHES TO DYSPHOTOPSIA ANALYSIS, ASSESSMENTOF PATIENT SATISFACTION AND SPECTACLE INDEPENDENCE AFTER MULTIFOCALINTRAOCULAR CORRECTION: REVIEW

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The core target of multifocal IOLs implantation is to provide advanced visual quality at different distances without spectacle or contact lenses that can be valuable when monofocal IOLs are implanted. Patients with monofocal IOLs need spectacles or contact lenses for the near and intermediate distance's vision. Multifocal intraocular lenses due to the optical part construction provide spectacle independence for patients in the postoperative period. The aim of this review was to analyze the modern approach to the several aspects of multifocal intraocular correction: spectacle independence, dysphotopsia, patient satisfaction. Patients’ questionnaire after surgery provides the data for evaluation of the quality of life, vision satisfaction at all range of distances on different levels of illumination, and patient activities of daily living. During the long period, a photic phenomenon (dysphotopsia) had been discussed in the literature as the principal reason for decrease of patients satisfaction with the treatment and lens explantation. Recently, high grade of spectacle independence and low risk of photic phenomena after modern multifocal IOLs implantation determine high-level patient satisfaction after cataract surgery. Multifocal intraocular correction is the effective technology for restoring passive accommodation that the wide range of the clinical studies proved. This review analyzes 33 studies (32 clinical studies and 1 metaanalisis) published in international peer-reviewed targeted titles.

About the authors

T. A. Morozova

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: TatianaMorozovaMD@gmail.com
Moscow Russian Federation

T. Z. Kerimov

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Author for correspondence.
Email: timkerimov2014@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8967-6370

Аспирант  кафедры глазных болезней ФГБОУ ВО «МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова» МР.

127473, Москва,  ул. Делегатская, д. 20, стр. 1.

SPIN-код: 1297-9373 Russian Federation

References

  1. Rosen E, Alio JL, Dick HB, et al. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):310–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.014.
  2. Kim JS, Jung JW, Lee JM, et al. Clinical outcomes following implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with varying add powers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(4):702–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.021.
  3. Maurino V, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Quality of vision after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a randomized trial ― AT LISA 809M versus AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(4):700–710. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.002.
  4. Ogawa T, Shiba T, Tsuneoka H. Usefulness of implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lens in eyes with long axial lengths. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:956046. doi: 10.1155/2015/956046.
  5. Munoz G, Albarran-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al. Visual function after bilateral implantation of a new zonal refractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(11):2043–2052. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.045.
  6. Малюгин Б.Э., Тахтаев Ю.В., Морозова Т.А., Поздеева Н.А. Результаты мультицентровых исследований имплантации мультифокальной градиентной ИОЛ третьего поколения (Градиол 3) // Офтальмохирургия. ― 2012. ― №2 ― С. 36–41. [Malyugin BE, Takhtaev YV, Morozova TA, Pozdeeva NA. Clinical outcomes of the third generation multifocal gradient IOL implantation in prospective multicenter study. Ophtalmosurgery. 2012;(2):36−41. (In Russ).]
  7. Marques EF, Ferreira TB. Comparison of visual outcomes of 2 diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):354–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.048.
  8. Kretz FT, Choi CY, Muller M, et al. Visual outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence with a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016;30(3):180–191. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.3.180.
  9. Marques EF, Ferreira TB, Simoes P. Visual performance and rotational stability of a multifocal toric intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(7):444–450. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160502-01.
  10. Packer M, Chu YR, Waltz KL, et al. Evaluation of the aspheric tecnis multifocal intraocular lens: one-year results from the first cohort of the food and drug administration clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(4):577–584 e571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.022.
  11. Yamauchi T, Tabuchi H, Takase K, et al. Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses.PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e68236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068236.
  12. Guo X, Sun Y, Zhang B, Zheng D. Medium-term visual outcomes of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with +3.00 d addition power. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:247829. doi: 10.1155/2014/247829.
  13. Shah S, Peris-Martinez C, Reinhard T, Vinciguerra P. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery: multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(10):658–666. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150611-01.
  14. Davison JA. Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1346–1355. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00611-8.
  15. Haring G, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, et al. Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: results of a multicenter questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(2):245–249. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00540-X.
  16. Cataract in the adult eye. Preferred practice pattern [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2011. p. 30 [cited 2017 Sep 19]. Available from: http://bdoc.info/dl/informationen/Cataract-in-the-Adult-Eye-2011-AAO-komplett.pdf.
  17. Морозова Т.А. Интраокулярная коррекция афакии мультифокальной линзой с градиентной оптикой. Клинико-теоретическое исследование: Автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. ― М.; 2006. ― 124 с. [Morozova TA. Intraokulyarnaya korrektsiya afakii mul’tifokal’noi linzoi s gradientnoi optikoi. Kliniko-teoreticheskoe issledovanie. [dissertation] Moscow; 2006. 124 p. (In Russ).]
  18. Henderson BA, Geneva II. Negative dysphotopsia: a perfect storm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2291–2312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.002.
  19. Hong X, Liu Y, Karakelle M, et al. Ray-tracing optical modeling of negative dysphotopsia. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16(12):125001. doi: 10.1117/1.3656745.
  20. Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):992–997. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031.
  21. Baykara M, Akova YA, Arslan OS, et al. Visual outcomes at 12 months in patients following implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.Ophthalmol Ther. 2015;4(1):20–32. doi: 10.1007/s40123-015-0032-4.
  22. Akaishi L, Vaz R, Vilella G, et al. Visual performance of tecnis ZM900 diffractive multifocal IOL after 2500 implants: a 3-year followup. J Ophthalmol. 2010;2010:717591. doi: 10.1155/2010/717591.
  23. Chang DH. Visual acuity and patient satisfaction at varied distances and lighting conditions after implantation of an aspheric diffractive multifocal one-piece intraocular lens. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016;10:1471–1477. doi: 10.2147/Opth.S108298.
  24. Vryghem JC, Heireman S. Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1957–1965. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S44415.
  25. Puell MC, Perez-Carrasco MJ, Hurtado-Cena FJ, Alvarez-Rementeria L. Disk halo size measured in individuals with monofocal versus diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(11):2417–2423. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.030.
  26. Alba-Bueno F, Vega F, Millan MS. [Halos and multifocal intraocular lenses: origin and interpretation. (In Spanish).] Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2014;89(10):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2014.01.002.
  27. De Vries NE, Webers CA, Verbakel F, et al. Visual outcome and patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(11):1897–1904. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.030.
  28. Osher RH. Negative dysphotopsia: long-term study and possible explanation for transient symptoms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(10):1699–1707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.026.
  29. Maxwell A, Holland E, Cibik L, et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of bilateral implantation of a +2.5 diopter multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.026.
  30. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(5):630–638. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170074026.
  31. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, et al. Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):638–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.056.
  32. Venter JA, Pelouskova M, Collins BM, et al. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(10):1477–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.035.
  33. Морозова Т.А., Покровский Д.Ф., Медведев И.Б., Керимов Т.З. Современные аспекты мультифокальной интраокулярной коррекции //Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. ― 2017. ― Т.72. ― №4 ― С. 268–275. [Morozova TA, Pokrovskiy DF, Medvedev IB, Kerimov TZ. Modern aspects of multifocal intraocular correction: a review. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2017;72(4):268–275. (In Russ).] doi: 10.15690/vramn835.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2017 "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies