DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF INTEGRAL SCORING SYSTEMS IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS AND PATIENT’S CONDITION
- Authors: Vinnik Y.S.1, Dunaevskaya S.S.1, Antyufrieva D.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 70, No 1 (2015)
- Pages: 90-94
- Section: SHORT MESSAGES
- Published: 28.01.2015
- URL: https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/76
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn.v70i1.1236
- ID: 76
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of specific and nonspecific scoring systems Tolstoy–Krasnogorov score, Ranson, BISAP, Glasgow, MODS 2, APACHE II and CTSI, which used at urgent pancreatology for estimation the severity of acute pancreatitis and status of patient. Methods: 1550 case reports of patients which had inpatient surgical treatment at Road clinical hospital at the station Krasnoyarsk from 2009 till 2013 were analyzed. Diagnosis of severe acute pancreatitis and its complications were determined based on anamnestic data, physical examination, clinical indexes, ultrasonic examination and computed tomography angiography. Specific and nonspecific scores (scoring system of estimation by Tolstoy–Krasnogorov, Ranson, Glasgow, BISAP, MODS 2, APACHE II, CTSI) were used for estimation the severity of acute pancreatitis and patient’s general condition. Effectiveness of these scoring systems was determined based on some parameters: accuracy (Ас), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Most valuables score for estimation of acute pancreatitis’s severity is BISAP (Se — 98,10%), for estimation of organ failure — MODS 2, (Sp — 100%, PPV — 100%) and APACHE II (Sp — 100% PPV — 100%), for detection of pancreatonecrosis sings — CTSI (Sp — 100%, NPV — 100%), for estimation of need for intensive care — MODS 2, (Sp — 100%, PPV — 100%, NPV — 96,29%) and APACHE II (Sp — 100%, PPV — 100%, NPV — 97,21%), for prediction of lethality — MODS 2, (Se — 100% Sp — 98,14%, NPV — 100%) and APACHE II (Se — 95,00%, NPV — 99,86%). Conclusion: Most effective scores for estimation of acute pancreatitis’s severity are Score of estimation by Tolstoy–Krasnogorov, Ranson, Glasgow and BISAP. Scoring systems MODS 2, APACHE II high specificity and positive predictive value allow using it at clinical practice.
About the authors
Yu. S. Vinnik
V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: yuvinnik@yandex.ru
доктор медицинских наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой общей хирургии КрасГМУ им. В.Ф. Войно-Ясенецкого Адрес: 660022, Красноярск, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1, тел.: +7 (391) 248-79-71 Россия
S. S. Dunaevskaya
V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Russian Federation
Email: vikto-potapenk@yandex.ru
кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры общей хирургии КрасГМУ им. В.Ф. Войно-Ясенецкого Адрес: 660022, Красноярск, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1, тел.: +7 (391) 248-79-71 Россия
D. A. Antyufrieva
V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Russian Federation
Email: silentium-fox@mail.ru
аспирант кафедры общей хирургии КрасГМУ им. В.Ф. Войно-Ясенецкого Адрес: 660022, Красноярск, Советский район, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 1, тел.: +7 (391) 248-79-71
РоссияReferences
- Vinnik Yu.S., Bulygin G.V., Dunaevskaya S.S. Efficacy of glutoksima in complex treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie = Siberian medical review. 2002; 22 (2): 29–32.
- Al Mofleh I.A. Severe acute pancreatitis: pathogenetic aspects and prognostic factors. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008; 14 (5): 675–684.
- Kaliev A.A., Zhakiev B.S., Eleuov G.A., Konakbaeva N.K. The use of ozone therapy and small doses of direct current in the complex treatment of sterile pancreatic necrosis. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk = Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2014; 1–2: 16–18.
- Fomin A.V., Gidranovich A.V. Gidranovich Assessment of the severity of patients with acute pancreatitis (review). Vestnik VGMU = Bulletin VSMU. 2004; 1: 41–50.
- Dunaevskaya S.S., Antyufrieva D.A. Prediction of the possible outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Vrach-aspirant = Doctor-graduate student. 2013; 56 (1.1): 203-207.
- Bagnenko S.F., Tolstoi A.D., Krasnorogov V.B., Kurygin A.A., Grinev M.V., Lapshin V.N., Gol'tsov V.R. Acute pancreatitis (diagnostic and treatment protocols). Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii = Annals of surgical hepatology. 2006; 11 (1): 60–66.
- Papachistou G.I., Muddana V., Yadav Dh. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson`s, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predictin organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 435–441.
- Balthazar E.J., Ranson J.H., Naidich D.P., Megibow A.J., Caccavale R., Cooper M.M. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology. 1985; 156 (3): 767–772.
- Sinenchenko G.I., Pivovarova L.P., Shilyaev A.V., Dvoinov V.G. Prognostic factors of severity of acute destructive pancreatitis. Vestnik rossiiskoi voenno-meditsinskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Russian military medical academy. 2007; 1 (17): 100–105.
- Osnovy intensivnoi terapii (Rukovodstvo Vsemirnoi federatsii obshchestv anesteziologov). Pod red. B. Makkormik [Fundamentals of Intensive Care Unit (Guide of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists). Edited by B. Makkormik]. Arkhangelsk, SGMU, 2014. 464 p.
- Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines; Besselink M., van Santvoort H., Freeman M., Gardner T., Mayerle J., Vege S.S. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013; 13: 1–15.
- Yaitskii N.A., Sedov V.M., Sopiya R.A. Ostryi pankreatit [Acute Pancreatitis]. Moscow, MEDpress-inform, 2003. 224 p.