Еffect of Radiation Therapy on Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients
- Authors: Shirokikh I.M.1, Khakimova G.G.1,2, Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.1, Khakimova S.G.2
-
Affiliations:
- P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
- Tashkent Pediatric Medical University
- Issue: Vol 79, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 153-157
- Section: ONCOLOGY: CURRENT ISSUES
- Published: 11.06.2024
- URL: https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/7186
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn7186
- ID: 7186
Cite item
Abstract
Background. The surgical stage remains the main one in the combined and complex treatment of breast cancer. Radical mastectomy and reconstructive plastic surgery are the main option for surgical treatment of vast majority patients. Radiation therapy can lead to the development of complications after breast reconstruction, and vice versa, the reconstructed mammary gland can cause technical difficulties for the radiologist to properly adjust the required dose of irradiation.
Aim — to choose the optimal method of breast reconstruction using various implants, as well as endoprostheses to minimize post-radiation complications and maintain a high level of quality of life for patients after breast cancer treatment.
Methods. The retrospective study was conducted in the department of oncology and reconstructive plastic surgery of the breast and skin in the P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute from June 2013 to November 2017. There were performed 132 operations: 111 subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage reconstruction with an endoprothesis and 21 mastectomy with a one-stage reconstruction with an endoprothesis. The distribution by stages: I — 57, IIA — 39, IIB — 17, IIIA — 13, IIIC 4; 2 cases of breast sarcoma. Prophylactic mastectomy of the contralateral gland was performed in 22 patients, mastopexy in 8, augmentation in 20. Polyurethane implants were applied in 82 cases (62%). Radiation therapy was performed in 47 patients with total dose 45 Gy. Bilateral reconstruction was performed in 22 patients.
Results. The mean follow-up period was 28.44 ± 14.66 months (from 6 to 48 months). The most frequent complication in the postoperative period was the development of capsular contracture: seroma — 20 patients, hematoma — 2, edge necrosis — 6, protrusion — 6, infection — 2 patients. The most common capsular contracture by Baker was III degree, n = 18. The average period of development of capsular contracture was 7.6 ± 11.65 months.
Conclusion. Despite the greater number of complications during the one-stage reconstruction, the implants remain in advantage in choosing a method of treating breast cancer by both the patient and the surgeon.
Full Text
About the authors
Irina M. Shirokikh
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
Author for correspondence.
Email: shirokikh-irina1@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1742-3205
SPIN-code: 2577-4539
MD, PhD
Россия, MoscowGulnoz G. Khakimova
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Tashkent Pediatric Medical University
Email: hgg_doc@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4970-5429
MD, PhD
Россия, Moscow; TashkentAziz D. Zikiryakhodzhaev
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
Email: aziz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7141-2502
SPIN-code: 8421-0364
MD, PhD, Professor
Россия, MoscowShakhnoz G. Khakimova
Tashkent Pediatric Medical University
Email: shahnoz_hakimova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9491-0413
SPIN-code: 6619-6957
MD, PhD, Associate Professor
Узбекистан, TashkentReferences
- Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L, et al. Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast. 2012;21(3):230–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.013
- Park SH, Han W, Yoo TK, et al. Oncologic Safety of Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: A Matched Case Control Study. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19(1):68–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.1.68
- Meretoja TJ, Smitten KA, Leidenius MH, et al. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15-year series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(10):1142–1145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.03.022
- Truong PT, Woodward WA, Buchholz TA. Optimizing locoregional control and survival for women with breast cancer: a review of current developments in postmastectomy radiotherapy. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2006;6(2):205–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.6.2.205
- Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(1):15–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1401-x
- Tsoi B, Ziolkowski N, Thoma A, et al. Safety of Tissue Expander/Implant versus Autologous abdominal Tissue Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(2):234–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000436847.94408.11
- Shah C, Kundu N, Arthur D, et al. Radiation Therapy Following Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1313–1322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2689-4
- Jagsi R, Momoh A, Qi J, et al. Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Breast Reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(2):157–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx148
- Santosa KB, Chen X, Qi J, et al. Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Better Time to Irradiate? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):761–769. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002534
- Ohri N, Cordeiro P, Keam J, et al. Quantifying the impact of immediate reconstruction in postmastectomy radiation: a large, dose-volume histogram-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(2):e153–е159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.026