Experience in a Standardized Algorithm for Surgical Treatment of Patients with Mandibular Fractures

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. In recent decades, new surgical technologies for the treatment of patients with mandibular fractures have been introduced into clinical practice. However, the incidence of complications still remains high, practically not differing from the values 30 years ago. According to the Russian Dental Association, the incidence of complications is 15–19%. Probably, the introduction of rules governing the use of new methods of treatment can change the current situation for general clinical practice. Aims — to evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithm for the surgical treatment of patients with mandibular fractures, developed on the basis of clinical observations and biomechanical studies, based on significant clinical material. Methods. A retrospective study over a 3-year period of medical records of inpatients with mandibular fractures and their complications was carried out, in the surgical treatment of which, in the conditions of the basic clinic, the surgical algorithm developed by the authors was used. Results. Case histories of 442 patients who met the search criteria were examined. In terms of the composition of the patients included in the study group, it reflects a typical picture for this type of injury, which is typical for domestic clinical practice. The incidence of postoperative complications was 4.1% (of which accompanied by a prolongation of treatment — 2% of cases). Conclusion. The results of this work showed that the real percentage of complications in patients with injuries of the lower jaw can be significantly reduced due to strict compliance with the requirements of the algorithm, which was shown by a retrospective analysis of medical records of inpatients over a three-year period, reflecting the results of treatment of a significant number of patients. The data obtained can serve as the basis for appropriate multicenter clinical trials.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexander S. Pankratov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: stomat-2008@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9620-3547
SPIN-code: 9785-2632

MD, PhD, Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Zauri P. Gotsiridze

City Clinical Hospital No. 1

Email: zauriqoc@gmail.com

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Svetlana I. Kurshina

City Clinical Hospital No. 1

Email: parrera@mail.ru

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anatoly V. Karalkin

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education

Email: avkrar@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3327-5206
SPIN-code: 8049-2738

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vasily M. Grinin

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: grynin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2280-8559
SPIN-code: 9663-2378

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Leyli U. Valieva

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: leyka3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3990-3843

Postgraduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Wusiman P, Maimaitituerxun B, Guli , et al. Epidemiology and Pattern of Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(5):e517–e520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006719
  2. Ferrer ÚMJ, Sanfrutos BS, Clavero GMA, et al. Epidemiological Study of the Socioeconomic Impact of Mandible Fractures in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital: Review of the Literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019;18(2):217–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1148-6
  3. Челюстно-лицевая хирургия: Национальное руководство / под ред. А.А. Кулакова. — М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2019. — 692 с. [Hirurgicheskaya stomatologiya i chelyustno-licevaya hirurgiya. Nacional’noe rukovodstvo / Ed. by A.A. Kulakov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 692 p. (In Russ.)]
  4. Сипкин А.М., Ахтямова Н.Е., Ахтямов Д.В. Характеристика острых травматических повреждений челюстно-лицевой области // Российский медицинский журнал. — 2016.— № 14.— С. 932–935. [Sipkin AM, Ahtyamova NE, Ahtyamov DV. Characteristics of acute traumatic injuries of maxillofacial region. RMJ. 2016;14:932–935. (In Russ.)]
  5. Singh RK, Pal US, Agrawal A, et al. Single miniplate osteosynthesis in angle fracture. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011;2(1):47–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.85853
  6. Sbordone C, Barca I, Petrocelli M, et al. The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on the Epidemiology of Maxillofacial Fractures in Southern Italy. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2119–2123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004603
  7. Winstanley RP. Fractures of the mandible: the case for minimal intervention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(4):380. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80326-9
  8. Козлов В.А. Неотложная стационарная стоматологическая помощь. — Л.: Медицина, 1988. — 288 с. [Kozlov VA. Neotlozhnaya stacionarnaya stomatologicheskaya pomoshch’. Leningrad: Medicina; 1988. 288 s. (In Russ.)]
  9. Аджиев К.С. Профилактика гнойно-воспалительных осложнений переломов нижней челюсти с помощью вибромассажа на собственных частотах сердечно-сосудистой системы пациентов: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. — М., 1991. — 16 с. [Adzhiev KS. Profilaktika gnojno-vospalitel’nyh oslozhnenij perelomov nizh-nej chelyusti s pomoshch’yu vibromassazha na sobstvennyh chastotah serdechno-sosudistoj sistemy pacientov: avtoreferat diss. kand. med. nauk. Moscow; 1991. 16 s. (In Russ.)]
  10. Munante-Cardenas JL, Henrique P, Nunes F, et al. Etiology, treatment, and complications of mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(3):611–615. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001273
  11. Odom EB, Snyder-Warwick AK. Mandible Fracture Complications and Infection: The Influence of Demographics and Modifiable Factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(2):282e–289e. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002385
  12. Lee UK, Rojhani A, Herford AS, et al. Immediate Versus Delayed Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Stratified Analysis of Complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(6):1186–1196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.019
  13. Moura LB, Dos Santos Trento G, de Azambuja Carvalho PH, et al. Double unilateral, bilateral and multiple mandibular fractures: an observational study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22(3):315–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0713-y
  14. Chen CL, Zenga J, Patel R, et al. Complications and Reoperations in Mandibular Angle Fractures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20(3):238–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.2227
  15. Клинические рекомендации (протоколы лечения). Перелом нижней челюсти // Стоматологическая aссоциация России [Электронный ресурс]. Available from: https://e-stomatology.ru/director/protokols/protokol_perelom.php (accessed: 10.05.2022).
  16. Панкратов А.С. Анализ послеоперационных осложнений при использовании современных технологий накостного остеосинтеза нижней челюсти (к 130-летию разработки Hausmann первых накостных пластин для фиксации фрагментов нижней челюсти) // Российский стоматологический журнал. — 2016. — Т. 20. — № 5. — С. 237–244. [Pankratov AS. The analysis of postoperative complications with the use of modern technologies of osteosynthesis of the lower plate of four-jaw position (to the 130th anniversary of the development hausmann first plate pla stin for fixation of fragments of the lower jaw). Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2016;20(5):237–244. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.18821/1728-28022016;20(5):237-244
  17. Champy M, Pape HD, Gerlach KL, et al. Mandibular fractures. The Strasbourg miniplate ostesynthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 1986;1:98–102.
  18. Панкратов А.С. Совершенствование методов оперативного лечения больных с переломами нижней челюсти и их осложнениями: дис. … д-ра мед. наук. — М., 2005. — 365 с. [Pankratov AS. Sovershenstvovanie metodov operativnogo lecheniya bol’nyh s pe-relomami nizhnej chelyusti i ih oslozhneniyami. Diss. d-ra med. nauk. Moscow; 2005. 365 s. (In Russ.)]
  19. Gratz K. Eine neue Klassifikation zur Einteilung von Unterkieferfrakturen. Med. Dissertation. Basel, 1986.
  20. Liu X-D, Wang Q-X, Liu W-X. Epidemiological pattern of maxillofacial fractures in northern China: A retrospective study of 829 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(9):e19299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019299
  21. Fox AJ, RM. Mandibular Angle Fractures: Two-Miniplate Fixation and Complications. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(6):464–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.5.6.464
  22. Furr AM, Schweinfurth JM., May WL. Factors associated with long‐term complications after repair of mandibular fractures. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(3):427–430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLG.0000194844.87268.ED
  23. Gordon PE, Lawler ME, Kaban LB, et al. Mandibular fracture severity and patient health status are associated with postoperative inflammatory complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(8):2191–2197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016 /j. joms.2011.03.071
  24. Медведев Ю.А., Милюкова Д.Ю. Тактика лечения пациентов с переломами нижней челюсти в пределах зубного ряда // Стоматология. — 2012. — Т. 91. — № 6. — С. 48–51. [Medvedev YuA, Milyukova DYu. Treatment tactics by mandibular fractures in teeth-bearing area. Stomatologiya. 2012;91(6):48–51. (In Russ.)]
  25. Daar DA, Kantar RS, Cammarata MJ, et al. Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in the Management of Mandibular Fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(2):571–577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005195
  26. Иванюшко Т.П., Тумбинская Л.В., Смирнов А.В., и др. Роль условно-патогенной микрофлоры полости рта в развитии травматического остеомиелита нижней челюсти // Стоматология. — 2012. — Т. 91. — № 6. — С. 37–40. [Ivanyushko TP, Tumbinskaya LV, Smirnov AV, et al. Role of oral cavity anaerobic microflora in the pathogenesis of mandible traumatic osteomyelitis. Stomatologiya. 2012;91(6):37–40. (In Russ.)]
  27. Murthy AS, Lehman Jr JA. Symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: a review of 76 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(6):603–607. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000183802.38116.37
  28. Bell, DM. Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures? J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2008;66(10):2116–2122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.370
  29. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения РФ от 08.02.2018 № 53н «Об утверждении порядка разработки стандартов медицинской помощи» // Медвестник. Портал российского врача [Электронный ресурс]. Available from: https://medvestnik.ru/content/documents/53n-ot-08-02-2018-g.html
  30. Regev E, Shiff JS, Kiss A, et al. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(6):1753–1760. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d0a9fc

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Frequency of occurrence of mandibular fractures depending on localization

Download (119KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies