The role of modern information technologies in the educational programs for children with normal visual functions and with ophthalmopathology

Cover Page
Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract


Today, in the educational process, the usual paper sources of information are increasingly giving way to electronic devices: smartphones, tablets, E-readers and computer monitors. Currently, in the field of cognitive activity continues active development in the field of cognitive science. Extensive opportunities in the use of interactive training programs, a positive impact on the cognitive functions of students, increasing the concentration of active attention on educational material, increasing motivation for learning are important advantages of electronic devices. Of particular importance are modern electronic devices for visually impaired students, allowing them to receive an education that is fully consistent with the education of students who do not have restrictions on health opportunities. The review describes the existing types of displays, lists their main characteristics that can affect the state of visual functions and visual performance. The current sanitary and hygienic requirements for the visual work of students with normal visual functions, and with severe ophthalmopathology, containing the basic provisions, but not taking into account, however, the diversity of currently used and emerging new electronic devices. In this regard, it emphasizes the prospects of research in the field of the impact of modern technology on the visual system and the development of appropriate recommendations for their use in the organization of the educational process.


Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Hristo P. Tahchidi

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: takhchidi_hp@rsmu.ru

Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997

MD, PhD, Professor

Maria A. Gracheva

Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: mg.iitp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0196-148X
SPIN-code: 1164-7489

Russian Federation, 19, B.Karetny, Moscow, 127051

PhD

Anna A. Kazakova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: AnneKazakova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5184-5316
SPIN-code: 2648-5849

Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997; 19 bld 1, Bolshoy Karetniy pereulok, 127051 Moscow

MD

Alla V. Strizhebok

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: astrizhebok@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7317-0911
SPIN-code: 3058-8712

Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997

Начальник отдела разработки прикладных медицинских технологий и изделий медицинской техники 

Nadezhda N. Vasilyeva

Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nvasilyeva@iitp.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8919-3069
SPIN-code: 6229-5381

Russian Federation, 19, B.Karetny, Moscow, 127051

PhD

References

  1. Тарутта Е.П., Проскурина О.В., Тарасова Н.А., Маркосян Г.А. Анализ факторов риска развития близорукости в дошкольном и раннем школьном возрасте // Анализ риска здоровью. ― 2019. ― №3. ― С. 26–33. [Tarutta EP, Proskurina OV, Tarasova NA, Markosyan GA. Analysis of risk factors that cause myopia in pre-school children and primary school students. Health risk analysis. 2019;(3):26−33. (In Russ).] doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2019.3.
  2. Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD, et al. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18(2):175−187. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017924.
  3. Табаченко Т.С. Проблемы когнитивного обучения в педагогическом образовании // Среднее специальное образование. ― 2007. ― №2. ― С. 2−4. [Tabachenko TS. Problemy kognitivnogo obucheniia v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii. Srednee spetsial’noe obrazovanie. 2007;(2):2−4. (In Russ).]
  4. Денискина В.З. Особые образовательные потребности детей с нарушением зрения // Дефектология. ― 2012. ― №6. ― С. 17–24. [Deniskina VZ. Special educational needs of visually impaired children. Defektologiia. 2012;(6):17–24. (In Russ).]
  5. Кукушкина О.И., Гончарова Е.Л. Компьютерные развивающие и обучающие игры для детей с ограниченными возможностями здоровья ― миссия и особенности // Воспитание и обучение детей с нарушениями развития. ― 2016. ― №8. ― С. 16−18. [Kukushkina OI, Goncharova EL. Computer developing and teaching games for children with special educational needs ― mission and peculiarities. Vospitanie i obuchenie detei s narusheniiami razvitiia. 2016;(8):16−18. (In Russ).]
  6. Jamshidifarsani Н, Garbaya S, Lim T, et al. Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: an analytical review. Computers Education. 2019;128:427–451. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.003.
  7. Безруких М.М., Комкова Ю.Н. Функциональное состояние организма детей 15−16 лет в зависимости от возраста начала работы за компьютером // Новые исследования. ― 2012. ― №3. ― С. 22−31. [Bezrukikh MM, Komkova YuN. The functional state of children aged 15−16 years, depending on the age of the beginning of work at the computer. Novye issledovaniia. 2016;(3):22−31. (In Russ).]
  8. Безруких М.М., Комкова Ю.Н. Особенности интеллектуального развития детей 15−16 лет с разным опытом работы за компьютером // Экспериментальная психология. ― 2010. ― Т.3. ― №3. ― С. 110−122. [Bezrukikh MM, Komkova YuN. Features of the intellectual development of 15−16 year old children with different PC work experience. Eksperimental’naia psikhologiia. 2010;3(3):110−122. (In Russ).]
  9. Dworak M, Schierl T, Bruns T, Strüder HK. Impact of singular excessive computer game and television exposure on sleep patterns and memory performance of school-aged children. Pediatrics. 2007;120(5):978−985. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0476.
  10. Gentile DA. Pathological video ― game use among youth 8 to 18: a national study. Psychol Sci. 2009;20(5):594−602. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02340.x.
  11. Lai JY, Chang CY. User attitudes toward dedicated e-book readers for reading: the effects of convenience, compatibility and media richness. Online Inform Rev. 2011;35(4):558–580. doi: 10.1108/14684521111161936.
  12. Huang YM, Liang TH. A technique for tracking the reading rate to identify the e-book reading behaviors and comprehension outcomes of elementary school students. Brit J Educat Technol. 2015;46(4):864–876. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12182.
  13. Yalman M. Preservice teachers views about e-book and their levels of use of e-books. Proc Soc Behavi Sci. 2015;176:255−262. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.469.
  14. Abbott M, Wills H, Miller A, Kaufman J. The relationship of error rate and comprehension in second and third grade oral reading fluency. Read Psychol. 2012;33(1–2). doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.630613.
  15. Darby A, Longmire-Avital B, Chenault J, Haglund M. Students motivation in academic service-leaning over the course of the semester. College Student J. 2013;47(1):185−191.
  16. Kim, YS, Park, CH, Wagner RK. Is oral/text reading fluency a «bridge» to reading comprehension? Read Writ. 2014;27(1):79–99. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9434-7.
  17. Pekrun, R, Goetz T, Frenzel AC, et al. Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contem Educati Psychol. 2011;36(1):36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.
  18. Ainley M, Hidi S. Interest and enjoyment. In: International Handbook of Emotions in Education. Routledge Handbooks Online; 2014. Рр. 205–227. doi: 10.4324/9780203148211.ch11.
  19. Pan Y, Gavain M. The continuity of college students’ autonomous learning motivation and its predictors: a three-year longitudinal study. Learning Individual Differences. 2012;22(1):92−99. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.010.
  20. Abramovich S, Schunn C, Higashi RM. Are badges useful in education? It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Education Techn Res Dev. 2013;61(2):217–232. doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2.
  21. Buckley P, Doyle E. Individualising gamification: an investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Computers Education. 2017;106:43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.009.
  22. Tian FJ, Yu CW, Chen CN. Exploration of application for e-books in elementary school disaster prevention education. Int J Org Inn. 2018;10(4):54−69.
  23. Lin PH, Su YN, Huang YM. Evaluating reading fluency behavior via reading rates of elementary school students reading e-books. Computer Human Behavior. 2019;100:258−265. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.004.
  24. Коng L, Fry M, Al-Samarraie M, et al. An update on progress and the changing epidemiology of causes of child. J AAPOS. 2012;16(6):501−507. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.004
  25. Ahmad FK. Use of assistive technology in inclusive education: making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience. 2015;(6):62−77.
  26. Рожкова Г.И., Подугольникова Т.А., Лешкевич И.А., и др. Компьютерное лечение косоглазия и амблиопии с применением случайно-точечных стереограмм // Вестник офтальмологии. ― 1998. ― Т.114. ― №4. ― С. 28–32. [Rozhkova GI, Podugol’nikova TA, Leshkevich IA, et al. Komp’iuternoe lechenie kosoglaziia i ambliopii s primeneniem sluchaino-tochechnykh stereogramm. Annals of ophthalmology. 1998;114(4):28–32. (In Russ).]
  27. Подугольникова Т.А., Рожкова Г.И. Зрительная работоспособность дошкольников и первоклассников с нормальным и нарушенным бинокулярным зрением. Дефектология. 2001. ― №2. ― С. 56−61. [Podugol’nikova TA, Rozhkova GI. Visual performance of preschool and first-graders with normal and impaired binocular vision. Defektologiia. 2001;(2):56−61. (In Russ).]
  28. Barker L, Thomas R, Rubin G, Dahlmann-Noor A. Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD010987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.Cd010987.pub2.
  29. Mednick Z, Jaidka A, Nesdole R, Bona M. Assessing the iPad as a tool for low-vision rehabilitation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52(1):13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.05.015.
  30. Gothwal VK, Thomas R, Crossland M, et al. Randomized trial of tablet computers for education and learning in children and young people with low vision. Opt Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):873−882. doi: 10.1097/opx.0000000000001270.
  31. McLaughlin R, Kamei-Hannan, C. Paper or digital text: which reading medium is best for students with visual impairments? J Visual Impairment Blindness. 2018;112(4):337–350. doi: 10.1177/0145482x1811200401.
  32. Kelly M. Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: findings from a national survey. J Visual Impairment Blindness. 2009;103(8):470–480. doi: 10.1177/0145482x0910300805.
  33. Alves CC, Monteiro GB, Rabello S, et al. Assistive technology applied to education of students with visual impairment. Rev Salud Publica. 2009;26(2):148−152. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892009000800007.
  34. Crossland MD, Silva RS, Macedo FF. Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5):552−557. doi: 10.1111/opo.12136.
  35. Сайдашева Э.И. Компьютерный зрительный синдром и школьная близорукость: современные подходы к профилактике и лечению. Учебное пособие. ― СПб.: СЗГМУ им. И.И. Мечникова, 2013. ― 32 с. [Saidasheva EI. Computer vision syndrome and school myopia: modern approaches to prevention and treatment. Uchebnoe posobie. Saint Petersburg: Severo-Zapadnyi gosudarstvennyi meditsinskii universitet im. I.I. Mechnikova; 2013. 32 p. (In Russ).]
  36. Исакова Е.В. Работа с компьютером и компьютерный зрительный синдром // Вятский медицинский вестник. ― 2011. ― №3-4. ― С. 32−35. [Isakova EV. Rabota s komp’iuterom i komp’iuternyi zritel’nyi sindrom. Medical newsletter of Vyatka. 2011;(3-4):32−35. (In Russ).]
  37. Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy J E. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Work. 2015;52(2):303–314. doi: 10.3233/wor-152162.
  38. Степанова М.И., Сазанюк З.И., Лапонова Е.Д., Лашнева И.П. Компьютерная занятость как фактор риска нарушения здоровья младших школьников // Российский педиатрический журнал. ― 2013. ― №3. ― С. 43−47. [Stepanova MI, Sazanuk ZI, Laponova ED, Lashneva IP. Computer employment as a risk factor for health disorders in small school children. Russian journal of pediatrics. 2013;(3):43−47. (In Russ).]
  39. Ефимова Е.Л., Бржеский В.В., Александрова А.С. Характеристика зрительных расстройств при использовании электронных учебников // Российский офтальмологический журнал. ― 2015. ― Т.8. ― №2. ― С. 27−33. [Efimova EL, Brjeskii VV, Aleksandrova AS. Visual disorders caused by using electronic textbooks and prospects of their correction (preliminary report). Rossiiskii oftal’mologicheskii jurnal. 2015;8(2):27−33. (In Russ).]
  40. Benedetto S, Drai-Zrbib V, Pedrotti M, et al. E-readers and visual fatigue. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083676.
  41. Kang YY, Wang MJ, Lin R. Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays. 2009;30(2):49–52. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2008.12.002.
  42. Кучма В.Р., Текшева Л.М., Вятлева О.А., Курганский А.М. Физиолого-гигиеническая оценка восприятия информации с электронного устройства для чтения (ридера) // Гигиена и санитария. ― 2013. ― Т.92. ― №1. ― С. 22–26. [Kuchma VR, Teksheva LM, Viyatleva OA, Kurganskii AM. Physiological and hygienic assessment of perception of the information from electronic device for reading (reader). Gigiena i sanitariia. 2013;92(1):22–26. (In Russ).]
  43. Текшева Л.М., Дадонова А.Я. Современные подходы при разработке гигиенических требований к предъявлению учебной информации на экранах компьютеров // Здоровье населения и среда обитания. ― 2007. ― №2. ― С. 38–41. [Teksheva LM, Dadonova AY. Sovremennye podkhody pri razrabotke gigienicheskikh trebovanii k pred”iavleniiu uchebnoi informatsii na ekranakh komp’iuterov. Zdorov’e naseleniia i sreda obitaniia. 2007;(2):38–41. (In Russ).]
  44. Tsubota K, Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(8):584. doi: 10.1056/nejm199302253280817.
  45. Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):502–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00834.x.
  46. Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A, et al. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(3):253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.008.
  47. Chu CA, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Blink patterns: reading from a computer screen versus hard copy. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(3):297–302. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000157.
  48. Jansen ME, Begley CG, Himebaugh NH, Port NL. Effect of contact lens wear and a near task on tear film break-up. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(5):350−357. doi: 10.1097/opx.0b013e3181d951df.
  49. Woody WD, Daniel DB, Baker CA. E-books or textbooks: students prefer textbooks. Computers Education. 2010;55(3):945–948. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005.
  50. Макарова Л.В., Лукьянец Г.Н., Параничева Т.М., Тюрина Е.В. Влияние компьютерной нагрузки на состояние физиологических функций у детей 7−10 лет // Физиология человека. ― 2017. ― Т.43. ― №2. ― С. 66−73. [Makarova LV, Luk’yanets GN, Paranicheva TM, Turina EV. Effect of computer work on the state of physiological functions in children aged 7 to 10 years. Human physiology. 2017;43(2):177−183. (In Russ).] doi: 10.7868/S0131164617020126.
  51. Леонова Л.А., Каралашвили Е.А., Макарова Л.В., Лукьянец Г.Н. Физиологические предпосылки успешного взаимодействия ребенка с компьютером // Физиология человека. ― 2010. ― Т.36. ― №2. ― С. 67−71. [Leonova LA, Karadashvili EA, Makarova LV, Luk’yanets GN. Physiological prerequisites for successful interaction between child and computer. Human physiology. 2010;36(2):179−183. (In Russ).]
  52. Матюхин В.В., Шардакова Е.Г., Ямпольская Е.Г., Елизарова В.В. Обоснование физиолого-эргономических мероприятий по снижению развития зрительного утомления при работе с видеодисплейными терминалами // Анализ риска здоровью. ― 2017. ― №3. ― С. 66−75. [Matuchin VV, Shardakova EG, Yampol’skaya EG, Elizarova VV. Giving grounds for physiological-ergonomic activities aimed at reducing eye fatigue caused by work with visual display terminals. Health risk analysis. 2017;(3):66−75. (In Russ).] doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2017.3.08.
  53. Kroemer AD, Kroemer KH. Office ergonomics. Ease and Efficiency at Work, Second Edition. Boca Raton, CRC Press; 2017. 300 p.
  54. Turgut B. Ocular ergonomics for the computer vision syndrome. Journal of Eye and Vision. 2018;1(1-2):1−9.
  55. Coles-Brennan C, Sulley A, Young G. Management of digital eye strain. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(1):18−29. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12798.

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 282

PDF (Russian) - 1

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies