Psychophysical and Electrophysiological Parameters of the Auditory Analyzer as Indicators of the Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Bilateral Deafness

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. The results of rehabilitation of patients with deafness after cochlear implantation (CI) depends on many factors related on both the individual characteristics of the patient and the technical parameters of auditory nerve stimulation — fitting of the CI system processor. Article presents the results of a study of the relationship between psychophysical (subjective) auditory sensations and electrophysiological (objective) responses of the structures of the auditory analyzer to electrical stimulation. Aims — to evaluate the relationship between the electrophysiological responses of the auditory analyzer and the psychophysical parameters of the thresholds of sound perception and speech intelligibility in patients with deafness after CI. Methods. The study involved 88 patients with IV bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, borderline with deafness, aged 6 to 17 years 11 months, among whom 54.5% (n = 48) of girls and 45.5% (n = 40) of boys. Of the patients included in the follow-up, 40% (n = 35) underwent unilateral CI; 60% (n = 53) of children underwent bilateral sequential CI. In our study, slightly more than half of the patients (51.1%) had experience using the CI system for more than 5 years. At the first stage of the study, we studied the relationship between sound perception thresholds (tonal audiometry in a free field) and registered ASSR (auditory steady state response) thresholds in patients with deafness receiving rehabilitation after CI surgery. The relationship between behavioral and electrophysiological (objective) thresholds was assessed by comparing the results of tonal threshold audiometry and the responses received during ASSR registration to acoustic stimulation in a free field. At the second stage, patients with indications for processor fitting (decreased speech intelligibility, uncomfortable sensations) underwent speech audiometry, evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) registration, according to the results of which the parameters of the CI processor were changed. Results. Research data showed the effectiveness of the approach of including the ECAP registration test, followed by the creation of a fitting card and correction of the level of auditory nerve stimulation under the control of speech audiometry in the protocol of fitting the CI processor. Conclusions. The results of the conducted studies allow us to recommend the use of the developed method of objective recording of sound perception thresholds in patients with CI as one of the indicators of the effectiveness of CI in the early period of auditory-speech rehabilitation in patients with undeveloped speech skills and when it is impossible to conduct objective tests accompanied by supra-threshold stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aleksandr V. Pashkov

Pediatric and Child Health Research Institute of the Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery; Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs

Author for correspondence.
Email: avpashkov.mail@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3197-2879
SPIN-code: 2779-8496

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Irina V. Naumova

Pediatric and Child Health Research Institute of the Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Email: irinanaumova22@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0559-4878
SPIN-code: 4621-6930

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ksenia I. Voevodina

Pediatric and Child Health Research Institute of the Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Email: ksuvoko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0249-1662
SPIN-code: 9030-1146

Laboratory Assistant

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexandra Е. Pashkova

Pediatric and Child Health Research Institute of the Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Email: aepashkova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2404-8477
SPIN-code: 6103-1033

Research Associate

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valentin I. Popadyuk

RUDN University

Email: lorval04@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3309-4683
SPIN-code: 6284-8040

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalia V. Ustinova

Pediatric and Child Health Research Institute of the Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Email: ust-doctor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3167-082X
SPIN-code: 5003-3852

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ayaz M. Mamedyarov

Pediatric and Child Health Research Institute of the Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Email: ayaz.mamedyarov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0818-6906
SPIN-code: 4621-5711

MD, PhD, Senior Researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Sininger YS, Hunter LL, Hayes D, et al. Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children with Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss. Ear Hear. 2018;39(6):1207–1223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000580
  2. Наумова И.В., Гадалева С.В., Пашков А.В. Стационарные слуховые потенциалы. Обзор литературы // Российская оториноларингология. — 2018. — Т. 3. — № 94. — С. 115–129. [Naumova IV, Gadaleva SV, Pashkov AV. Auditory steady-state responses. Literature review. Rossiiskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2018;3(94):115–129. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.18692/1810-4800-2018-3-115-129
  3. Наумова И.В., Пашков А.В., Воеводина К.И., и др. Восприятие речи и состояние порогов звуковосприятия у пациентов с кохлеарными имплантатами // Вестник оториноларингологии. — 2022. — Т. 87. — № 6. — С. 11–13. [Naumova IV, Pashkov AV, Voevodina KI, et al. Speech perception and the state of sound perception thresholds in patients with cochlear implants. Vestnik Otorinolaringologii. 2022;87(6):11–13. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20228706111
  4. Hughes ML, Stille LJ, Baudhuin JL, et al. ECAP spread of excitation with virtual channels and physical electrodes. Hear Res. 2013;306:93–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.09.014
  5. Garcia C, Goehring T, Cosentino S, et al. The Panoramic ECAP Method: Estimating Patient-Specific Patterns of Current Spread and Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021;22(5):567–589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-021-00795-2
  6. Greisiger R, Shallop JK, Hol PK, et al. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups. Cochlear Implants Int. 2015;16(Suppl4):1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2015.1110372
  7. Garcia C, Deeks JM, Goehring T, et al. An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear. 2023;44(3):627–640. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001305
  8. Stronks HC, Biesheuvel JD, de Vos JJ, et al. Test/Retest Variability of the eCAP Threshold in Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear. 2019;40(6):1457–1466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000721

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies