<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-6047</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2414-3545</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">7186</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15690/vramn7186</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ONCOLOGY: CURRENT ISSUES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ОНКОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Еffect of Radiation Therapy on Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Влияние лучевой терапии на реконструкцию молочной железы у больных раком молочной железы</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-3205</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">2577-4539</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shirokikh</surname><given-names>Irina M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Широких</surname><given-names>Ирина М.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н.</p></bio><email>shirokikh-irina1@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-5429</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khakimova</surname><given-names>Gulnoz G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хакимова</surname><given-names>Гулноз Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н.</p></bio><email>hgg_doc@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-2502</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">8421-0364</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zikiryakhodzhaev</surname><given-names>Aziz D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зикиряходжаев</surname><given-names>Азиз Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD, Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., профессор</p></bio><email>aziz@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9491-0413</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">6619-6957</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khakimova</surname><given-names>Shakhnoz G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хакимова</surname><given-names>Шахноз Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="UZ">Uzbekistan</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD, Associate Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н., доцент</p></bio><email>shahnoz_hakimova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский научно-исследовательский онкологический институт имени П.А. Герцена — филиал Национального медицинского исследовательского центра радиологии</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Tashkent Pediatric Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Ташкентский педиатрический медицинский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-06-11" publication-format="electronic"><day>11</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>157</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-02-28"><day>28</day><month>02</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-03-19"><day>19</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2024-12-11"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/7186">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/7186</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Background.</bold> The surgical stage remains the main one in the combined and complex treatment of breast cancer. Radical mastectomy and reconstructive plastic surgery are the main option for surgical treatment of vast majority patients. Radiation therapy can lead to the development of complications after breast reconstruction, and vice versa, the reconstructed mammary gland can cause technical difficulties for the radiologist to properly adjust the required dose of irradiation.</p> <p><bold>Aim </bold>— to choose the optimal method of breast reconstruction using various implants, as well as endoprostheses to minimize post-radiation complications and maintain a high level of quality of life for patients after breast cancer treatment.</p> <p><bold>Methods.</bold> The retrospective study was conducted in the department of oncology and reconstructive plastic surgery of the breast and skin in the P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute from June 2013 to November 2017. There were performed 132 operations: 111 subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage reconstruction with an endoprothesis and 21 mastectomy with a one-stage reconstruction with an endoprothesis. The distribution by stages: I — 57, IIA — 39, IIB — 17, IIIA — 13, IIIC 4; 2 cases of breast sarcoma. Prophylactic mastectomy of the contralateral gland was performed in 22 patients, mastopexy in 8, augmentation in 20. Polyurethane implants were applied in 82 cases (62%). Radiation therapy was performed in 47 patients with total dose 45 Gy. Bilateral reconstruction was performed in 22 patients.</p> <p><bold>Results. </bold>The mean follow-up period was 28.44 ± 14.66 months (from 6 to 48 months). The most frequent complication in the postoperative period was the development of capsular contracture: seroma — 20 patients, hematoma — 2, edge necrosis — 6, protrusion — 6, infection — 2 patients. The most common capsular contracture by Baker was III degree, n = 18. The average period of development of capsular contracture was 7.6 ± 11.65 months.</p> <p><bold>Conclusion. </bold>Despite the greater number of complications during the one-stage reconstruction, the implants remain in advantage in choosing a method of treating breast cancer by both the patient and the surgeon.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование.</bold> Хирургический этап остается базовым в комбинированном и комплексном лечении рака молочной железы. Радикальная мастэктомия и реконструктивно-пластическая хирургия являются основными вариантами хирургического лечения подавляющего большинства пациенток. Лучевая терапия может привести к развитию осложнений после реконструкции молочной железы, и, наоборот, реконструированная молочная железа может вызвать у врача-рентгенолога технические трудности с правильным планированием перед лучевой терапией.</p> <p><bold>Цель</bold> — выбрать оптимальный метод реконструкции молочной железы с использованием различных имплантов для минимизации постлучевых осложнений и сохранения высокого уровня качества жизни пациенток после лечения рака молочной железы.</p> <p><bold>Методы.</bold> Ретроспективное исследование проведено на базе отделения онкологии и реконструктивно-пластической хирургии молочной железы и кожи МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена, где с июня 2013 по ноябрь 2017 г. выполнено 132 операции — подкожной мастэктомии с одномоментной реконструкцией эндопротезом. Распределение по стадиям: I — 57, IIA — 39, IIB — 17, IIIA —13, IIIC — 4; 2 случая саркомы молочной железы. Профилактическая мастэктомия контралатеральной железы выполнена 22 пациенткам, мастопексия — 8, аугментация — 20. Полиуретановые имплантаты были установлены препекторально в 82 (62%) случаях, остальным пациенткам установлены текстурированные эндопротезы субмускулярно. Лучевая терапия проведена 47 пациенткам в суммарной дозе 45 Гр. Двусторонняя реконструкция выполнена 22 пациенткам.</p> <p><bold>Результаты.</bold> Средний период наблюдения составил 28,44 ± 14,66 мес (от 6 до 48 мес). Наиболее частым осложнением в послеоперационном периоде было развитие капсулярной контрактуры: серомы — 20 больных, гематомы — 2, краевого некроза — 6, протрузии — 6, инфекции — 2 больных. Наиболее часто встречалась капсулярная контрактура по Бейкеру III степени (n = 18). Средний срок развития капсулярной контрактуры составил 7,6 ± 11,65 мес.</p> <p><bold>Заключение.</bold> Несмотря на большее количество осложнений при одномоментной реконструкции, при выборе метода лечения рака молочной железы имплантаты сохраняют преимущество как у пациентки, так и у хирурга.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>breast cancer</kwd><kwd>one-stage breast reconstruction</kwd><kwd>acellular dermal matrix</kwd><kwd>ADM</kwd><kwd>mesh implant</kwd><kwd>mastectomy</kwd><kwd>radiation therapy</kwd><kwd>capsular contracture</kwd><kwd>polyurethane implant</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>одномоментная реконструкция молочной железы</kwd><kwd>ацеллюлярный дермальный матрикс</kwd><kwd>АДМ</kwd><kwd>сетчатый имплантат</kwd><kwd>мастэктомия</kwd><kwd>лучевая терапия</kwd><kwd>капсулярная контрактура</kwd><kwd>полиуретановый имплантат</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L, et al. Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast. 2012;21(3):230–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Park SH, Han W, Yoo TK, et al. Oncologic Safety of Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: A Matched Case Control Study. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19(1):68–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.1.68</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Meretoja TJ, Smitten KA, Leidenius MH, et al. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15-year series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(10):1142–1145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.03.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Truong PT, Woodward WA, Buchholz TA. Optimizing locoregional control and survival for women with breast cancer: a review of current developments in postmastectomy radiotherapy. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2006;6(2):205–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.6.2.205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(1):15–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1401-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Tsoi B, Ziolkowski N, Thoma A, et al. Safety of Tissue Expander/Implant versus Autologous abdominal Tissue Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(2):234–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000436847.94408.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Shah C, Kundu N, Arthur D, et al. Radiation Therapy Following Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1313–1322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2689-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Jagsi R, Momoh A, Qi J, et al. Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Breast Reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(2):157–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Santosa KB, Chen X, Qi J, et al. Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Better Time to Irradiate? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):761–769. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002534</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Ohri N, Cordeiro P, Keam J, et al. Quantifying the impact of immediate reconstruction in postmastectomy radiation: a large, dose-volume histogram-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(2):e153–е159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.026</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
