<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-6047</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2414-3545</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2235</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15690/vramn2235</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ONCOLOGY: CURRENT ISSUES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ОНКОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Systemic Inflammatory Response as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer. Part II. Hematological Markers of Inflammation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Системная воспалительная реакция как фактор прогноза при раке молочной железы. Часть II. Гематологические маркеры воспаления</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-9973</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">7102748586</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">I-2033-2014</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1805-8141</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sergeeva</surname><given-names>Natalia S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сергеева</surname><given-names>Наталья Сергеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Biology, Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.б.н., профессор</p></bio><email>prognoz.01@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8017-5657</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">6603382243</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">L-3592-2018</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4364-6134</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Karmakova</surname><given-names>Tatiana A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кармакова</surname><given-names>Татьяна Анатольевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Biology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.б.н.</p></bio><email>kalmar123@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-3106</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1134-3930</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Polyak</surname><given-names>Marianna A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Поляк</surname><given-names>Марианна Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-онколог</p></bio><email>marianna29@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5920-5823</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">54683346300</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9992-7676</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alentov</surname><given-names>Igor I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алентов</surname><given-names>Игорь Игоревич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Biology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.б.н.</p></bio><email>igoralentov@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский научно-исследовательский онкологический институт им. П.А. Герцена</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2022-12-25" publication-format="electronic"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-02-04" publication-format="electronic"><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>77</volume><issue>6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>408</fpage><lpage>419</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-10-03"><day>03</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-12-09"><day>09</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2024-02-04"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/about/submissions</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/2235">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/2235</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Chronic inflammation is one of the recognized factors contributing to the onset and progression of malignant neoplasms. At the systemic level, a chronic inflammatory process is accompanied by an increased levels of inflammatory mediators and a change in hematological parameters of peripheral blood. According to numerous clinical studies, the change in the ratio of blood cell populations in cancer patients is an independent prognostic factor in malignant tumors of various localizations. This review is devoted to hematological parameters of the systemic inflammatory response (SIR) in breast cancer (BC). The review presents the characteristics of blood cells used for calculations of hematological indices (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets); approaches for assessing SIR using these indices (NLR, PLR, LMR, etc.); comparative analysis of data on the association of the hematological indices with the clinical and morphological features of BC, patient survival and tumor response to chemotherapy. The data indicating the benefit of SIR hematological markers investigation during monitoring after treatment are summarized. Complex algorithms, including clinical, morphological and hematological factors, which are proposed to improve the quality of prognosis assessment, are considered. The information accumulated to date suggests that hematological indices reflecting SIR activity in BC patients can serve as additional independent prognostic factors. The development of the prognostic algorithms that are informative for certain clinical groups of BC patients is a promising area of research.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Хроническое воспаление — один из признанных факторов, способствующих возникновению и прогрессии злокачественных новообразований. На системном уровне хронический воспалительный процесс сопровождается изменением содержания в крови медиаторов воспаления и гематологических показателей периферической крови. Соотношение количества определенных популяций клеток крови у онкологических больных, по данным многочисленных клинических исследований, является независимым фактором прогноза при злокачественных опухолях различных локализаций. Настоящий обзор посвящен гематологическим показателям системной воспалительной реакции (СВР) при раке молочной железы (РМЖ). В статье описаны свойства клеток периферической крови (нейтрофилов, лимфоцитов, моноцитов, тромбоцитов), определяющие их связь с развитием онкологической патологии, и способы оценки выраженности СВР с использованием гематологических показателей (индексы NLR, PLR, LMR и др.). Представлен сравнительный анализ данных о взаимосвязи этих показателей с клинико-морфологическими особенностями РМЖ, выживаемостью больных и ответом опухоли на химиотерапию. Рассмотрены комбинированные алгоритмы, включающие клинико-морфологические факторы и гематологические индексы, которые предлагаются для повышения качества прогностической оценки. Накопленные на сегодняшний день данные свидетельствуют о том, что гематологические индексы, отражающие активность СВР у больных РМЖ, могут служить дополнительными независимыми факторами прогноза заболевания. Разработка прогностических алгоритмов, информативных для определенных клинических групп больных РМЖ, является перспективным направлением исследований.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>breast cancer</kwd><kwd>systemic inflammatory response</kwd><kwd>hematological markers</kwd><kwd>prognosis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>системная воспалительная реакция</kwd><kwd>гематологические индексы</kwd><kwd>прогноз</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр радиологии» Минздрава России</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and сancer: Triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity. 2019;51(1):27–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Hibino S, Kawazoe T, Kasahara H, et al. Inflammation-induced tumorigenesis and metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5421. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Salemme V, Centonze G, Cavallo F, et al. The crosstalk between tumor cells and the immune microenvironment in breast cancer: Implications for immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:610303. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.610303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Brenner DR, Scherer D, Muir K, et al. A review of the application of inflammatory biomarkers in epidemiologic cancer research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(9):1729–1751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Guner A, Kim HI. Biomarkers for evaluating the inflammation status in patients with cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2019;19(3):254–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Dolan RD, Lim J, McSorley ST, et al. The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with operable cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16955-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD, et al. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:235–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101324</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Kotoula V, Chatzopoulos K, Lakis S, et al. Tumors with high-density tumor infiltrating lymphocytes constitute a favorable entity in breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four prospective adjuvant trials. Oncotarget. 2016;7(4):5074–5087. doi: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Venkatesulu BP, Mallick S, Lin SH, et al. A systematic review of the influence of radiation-induced lymphopenia on survival outcomes in solid tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;123:42–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Emile G, Penager S, Levy C, et al. Baseline lymphopenia as prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib. Oncol Lett. 2022;23(1):25. doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.13143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Lee KH, Kim EY, Yun JS, et al. The prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and hematologic parameters in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4832-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Yoon CI, Park S, Cha YJ, et al. Associations between absolute neutrophil count and lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer. Breast. 2020;50:141–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Xiong S, Dong L, Cheng L. Neutrophils in cancer carcinogenesis and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01187-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Hajizadeh F, Aghebati Maleki L, Alexander M, et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils as new players in immunosuppressive process of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer. Life Sci. 2021;264:118699. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Margraf A, Zarbock A. Platelets in inflammation and resolution. J Immunol. 2019;203(9):2357–2367. doi: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1900899</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Plantureux L, Mège D, Crescence L, et al. Impacts of cancer on platelet production, activation and education and mechanisms of cancer-associated thrombosis. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(11):441. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10110441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Ward MP, Kane LE, Norris LA, et al. Platelets, immune cells and the coagulation cascade; friend or foe of the circulating tumour cell? Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-021-01347-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Chen Y, Song Y, Du W et al. Tumor-associated macrophages: an accomplice in solid tumor progression. J Biomed Sci. 2019;26(1):78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-019-0568-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Guo S, Chen X, Guo C, et al. Tumour-associated macrophages heterogeneity drives resistance to clinical therapy. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2022;24:e17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/erm.2022.8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Kiss M, Caro AA, Raes G, et al. Systemic reprogramming of monocytes in cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1399. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01399</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Seruga B, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(6):dju124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju124</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Li B, Zhou P, Liu Y, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced cancer: Review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;483:48–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.04.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Mao Y, Chen D, Duan S, et al. Prognostic impact of pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in advanced epithelial cancers: a meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18:201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-018-0698-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang F, Huang M, Zhou H, et al. A nomogram to predict the pathologic complete response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer based on simple laboratory indicators. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(12):3912–3919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07655-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Zhu J, Jiao D, Zhao Y, et al. Development of a predictive model utilizing the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in early breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80037-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Ueno A, Maeda R, Kin T, et al. Utility of the absolute lymphocyte count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer on eribulin: A real-world observational study. Chemotherapy. 2019;64(5–6):259–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000507043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Yao X, Huang J, Zhong H, et al. Targeting interleukin-6 in inflammatory autoimmune diseases and cancers. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;141(2):125–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.09.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Nakamoto S, Ikeda M, Kubo S, et al. The systemic immune markers at diagnosis can predict the survival benefit in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021;1(5):471–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Kim D, Bae SJ, Ahn SG, et al. RT-induced dynamic changes in the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer indicate poor prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022;193(3):637–647. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06601-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Ma Y, Zhang J, Chen X. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is associated with the poor prognosis of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:1571–1580. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S292048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Deng JP, Hua X, Long ZQ, et al. Prognostic value of skeletal muscle index and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio for lymph node-positive breast cancer patients after mastectomy. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(23):775. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Truffi M, Piccotti F, Albasini S, et al. Preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers are independent predictors of disease recurrence in ER+ HER2- early breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:773078. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.773078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Moldoveanu D, Pravongviengkham V, Best G, et al. Dynamic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A novel prognosis measure for triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(10):4028–4034. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08302-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Corbeau I, Jacot W, Guiu S. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer patients: A systematic review. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(4):958. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040958</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Azab B, Camacho-Rivera M, Taioli E. Average values and racial differences of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio among a nationally representative sample of United States subjects. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112361</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Lin BD, Hottenga JJ, Abdellaoui A, et al. Causes of variation in the neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios: a twin-family study. Biomark Med. 2016;10(10):1061–1072. doi: https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2016-0147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Howard R, Scheiner A, Kanetsky PA, et al. Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;38:11–21.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.07.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang L, Fang J, Ding J. High systemic immune-inflammation index predicts poor survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:475–484. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S231444</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>He Q, Li JY, Ren Q-L. Efficacy of neoadjuvant single or dual anti-HER-2 therapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer: A single-center retrospective study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(5):1467–1475. doi: https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.5.1467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Ligorio F, Fucà G, Zattarin E, et al. The pan-immune-inflammation-value predicts the survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer treated with first-line taxane-trastuzumab-pertuzumab. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(8):1964. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081964</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Deng Y, Li W, Liu X, et al. The combination of platelet count and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio is a prognostic factor in patients with resected breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(18):e18755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018755</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Chen L, Kong X, Wang Z, et al. Pretreatment systemic inflammation response index in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a useful prognostic indicator. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:1543–1567. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S235519</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Şahin AB, Cubukcu E, Ocak B, et al. Low pan-immune-inflammation-value predicts better chemotherapy response and survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94184-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang C, Zhang S, Qiao K, et al. The pretreatment systemic inflammation response index as a useful prognostic factor is better than lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(5):424–438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Lin F, Zhang LP, Xie SY, et al. Pan-immune-inflammation value: A new prognostic index in operative breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:830138. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.830138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Wang P, Yue W, Li W, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index and ultrasonographic classification of breast imaging-reporting and data system predict outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:813–819. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S185890</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Hu RJ, Liu Q, Ma JY, et al. Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts breast cancer outcome: A meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;484:1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Guo W, Lu X, Liu Q, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for breast cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of 17079 individuals. Cancer Med. 2019;8(9):4135–4148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang Y, Sun Y, Zhang Q. Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01308-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Li W, Ma G, Deng Y, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index is a prognostic factor for breast cancer patients after curative resection. Front Oncol. 2021;11:570208. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.570208</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Zhu M, Chen L, Kong X, et al. The systemic immune-inflammation index is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2022;14:775–820. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S346406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Hua X, Long ZQ, Huang X, et al. The preoperative systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) independently predicts survival in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2020;44(4):100560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100560</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Wang L, Zhou Y, Xia S, et al. Prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) before and after surgery in operable breast cancer patients. Cancer Biomark. 2020;28(4):537–547. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-201682</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Dong J, Sun Q, Pan Y, et al. Pretreatment systemic inflammation response index is predictive of pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08458-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Eren T, Karacin C, Ucar G, et al. Correlation between peripheral blood inflammatory indicators and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(22):e20346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Boér K, Kahán Z, Landherr L, et al. Pathologic complete response rates after neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab with chemotherapy in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer — increasing rates of breast conserving surgery: A real-world experience. Pathol Oncol Res. 2021;27:1609785. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1609785</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Tang L, Shu X, Tu G. Exploring the influencing factors of the pathologic complete response in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02492-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Li X, Tan Q, Li H, Yang X. Predictive value of pretreatment peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer prognosis. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:5889–5898. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S313123</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Muñoz-Montaño W, Cabrera-Galeana P, Alvarado-Miranda A, et al. Prognostic value of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in different phenotypes of locally advanced breast cancer during neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(4):307–316.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang C, Lu Y, Zhang S, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index is superior to neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in prognostic assessment of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:7961568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7961568</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Cuello-López J, Fidalgo-Zapata A, López-Agudelo L, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Kaytaz Tekyol K, Gurleyik G, Aktaş A, et al. Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: The relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14774. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14774</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Hu Y, Wang S, Ding N, et al. Platelet/lymphocyte ratio is superior to neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of chemotherapy response and disease-free survival in luminal B-like (HER2-) breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(4):e403–e409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Corbeau I, Thezenas S, Maran-Gonzalez A, et al. Inflammatory blood markers as prognostic and predictive factors in early breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2666. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092666</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Kim JY, Jung EJ, Kim JM, et al. Dynamic changes of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts breast cancer prognosis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07700-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Meng X, Wang X, Jiang C, et al. Correlation analysis of lymphocyte-monocyte ratio with pathological complete response and clinical prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Transl Oncol. 2022;18:101355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101355</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Goto W, Kashiwagi S, Asano Y, et al. Predictive value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in the preoperative setting for progression of patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5051-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Song X, Ma J, Zhang H, et al. Prognostic significance of the primary tumor site and immune indexes in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer. Gland Surg. 2020;9(5):1450–1468. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-622</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Marín Hernández C, Piñero Madrona A, Gil Vázquez PJ, et al. Usefulness of lymphocyte-to-monocyte, neutrophil-to-monocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios as prognostic markers in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20(4):476–483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1732-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Hester RH, Hortobagyi GN, Lim B. Inflammatory breast cancer: early recognition and diagnosis is critical. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(4):392–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Lim B, Woodward WA, Wang X, et al. Inflammatory breast cancer biology: the tumour microenvironment is key. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(8):485–499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0010-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Van Berckelaer C, Van Geyt M, Linders S, et al. A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio are associated with a worse outcome in inflammatory breast cancer. Breast. 2020;53:212–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Al Jarroudi O, El Bairi K, Abda N, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of outcomes in inflammatory breast cancer. Biomark Med. 2021;15(14):1289–1298. doi: https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2020-0717</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Takada K, Kashiwagi S, Asano Y, et al. Clinical evaluation of dynamic monitoring of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in primary endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(10):5581–5588. doi: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13752</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Myojin M, Horimoto Y, Ito M, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and histological type might predict clinical responses to eriburin-based treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2020;27(4):732–738. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01069-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Orlandini LF, Pimentel FF, Andrade JM, et al. Obesity and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are prognostic factors in non-metastatic breast cancer patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021;54(10):e11409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2021e11409</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Takamizawa S, Shimoi T, Satomi-Tsushita N, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor for patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer treated using capecitabine: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09112-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Cho U, Park HS, Im SY, et al. Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers and development of a nomogram in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200936. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200936</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Huszno J, Kolosza Z. Prognostic value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte, platelet-lymphocyte and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(6):6275–6283. doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10966</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Wang Y, Huang G, Li Z. Prognostic significance of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with breast cancer skeletal metastases. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:11463–11475. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S277291</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Ji H, Xuan Q, Yan C, et al. The prognostic and predictive value of the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in luminal-type breast cancer patients treated with CEF chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7(23):34881–34889. doi: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8993</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Yin Y, Zhang Y, Li L, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and development of a nomogram in breast cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2021;11:650980. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.650980</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang Z, Lin Q, Chen Y, et al. Prognostic evaluation of metastasis-related lymphocyte/monocyte ratio in stage I-III breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Front Oncol. 2022;11:782383. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.782383</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Gerratana L, Basile D, Toffoletto B, et al. Biologically driven cut-off definition of lymphocyte ratios in metastatic breast cancer and association with exosomal subpopulations and prognosis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63291-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Koh YW, Lee HJ, Ahn JH, et al. Prognostic significance of the ratio of absolute neutrophil to lymphocyte counts for breast cancer patients with ER/PR-positivity and HER2-negativity in neoadjuvant setting. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(10):9823–9830. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2282-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Zenan H, Zixiong L, Zhicheng Y, et al. Clinical prognostic evaluation of immunocytes in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(11):20584–20602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Tiainen S, Rilla K, Hämäläinen K, et al. The prognostic and predictive role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in early breast cancer, especially in the HER2+ subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;185(1):63–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05925-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Moon G, Noh H, Cho IJ, et al. Prediction of late recurrence in patients with breast cancer: elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 5 years after diagnosis and late recurrence. Breast Cancer. 2020;27(1):54–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-00994-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Kim KM, Choi HS, Noh H, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio after treatment completion as a potential predictor of survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2021;24(5):443–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Dan J, Tan J, Huang J, et al. The dynamic change of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is predictive of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer. 2020;27(5):982–988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01096-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Zheng Y, Wu C, Yan H, et al. Prognostic value of combined preoperative fibrinogen-albumin ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio score in patients with breast cancer: A prognostic nomogram study. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;506:110–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Polley M-YC, Leon-Ferre RA, Leung S, et al. A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;185(3):557–566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-06030-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Hua X, Duan F, Zhai W, et al. A novel inflammatory-nutritional prognostic scoring system for patients with early-stage breast cancer. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:381–394. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S338421</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
