<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-6047</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2414-3545</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">152</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15690/vramn.v68i8.716</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY: CURRENT ISSUES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ АКУШЕРСТВА И ГИНЕКОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">ONCOGYNECOLOGICAL ASPECTS ОF ADNEXAL MASSES</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ОНКОГИНЕКОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ КИСТОЗНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ ЯИЧНИКОВ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gasparov</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гаспаров</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, professor, member of RANS, Head of the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Reproductive Medicine of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, People's Friendship University of Russia Address: 117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya St., 8; tel.: (495) 434-10-60</p></bio><email>7767778@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhordania</surname><given-names>K. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жорданиа</surname><given-names>К. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, professor of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of RAMS, Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, A.E. Evdokimov Moscow State Medico-Stomatological University, member of the Moscow Society of Oncologists, member of the International Society of Gynecological Oncology (International Gynecologic Cancer Society) Address: 115478, Moscow, Kashirskoe highway, 24; tel.: (499) 324-19-19</p></bio><email>kiazo2@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Payanidi</surname><given-names>Yu. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Паяниди</surname><given-names>Ю. Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, (N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS), professor of the Faculty of Advanced Training of health care professionals, People's Friendship University of Russia, member of the Moscow Society of Oncologists. Address: 115478, Moscow, Kashirskoe highway, 24; tel.: (499) 324-19-19</p></bio><email>paian-u@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dubinskaya</surname><given-names>E. D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дубинская</surname><given-names>Е. Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, associate professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine of Faculty of Postgraduate Education, People's Friendship University of Russia Address: 117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya St., 8; tel.: (495) 434-10-60</p></bio><email>eka-dubinskaya@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">People’s Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский университет дружбы народов, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Blokhin Russian Oncological Scientific Centre RAMS, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский онкологический научный центр им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-08-19" publication-format="electronic"><day>19</day><month>08</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>68</volume><issue>8</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii medetsinskikh nauk / Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</issue-title><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2015-08-07"><day>07</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 1970, "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 1970, Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1970</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/about/submissions</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/152">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/152</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Adnexal masses are frequently found in both symptomatic and asymptomatic women. The frequency of them is 7,8% in reproductive aged women and 2,5–18% in postmenopausal patients. </italic><italic><bold>Aim</bold>:</italic><italic> to investigate clinical significance of the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) and to compare it with histological findings in patients with adnexal masses. </italic><bold><italic>Patients and methods</italic></bold><italic>: 345 patients with adnexal masses were evaluated. Depending on the menopausal status, serum CA-125 level and ultrasonographic findings RMI scores were calculated for each of patients. </italic><bold><italic>Results</italic></bold><italic><bold>: </bold>according to RMI all the patients were divided in to two groups: first group — 283 (62%) of patients with RMI less then 200 and the second group — 52 (38%) women with RMI more then 200. The patients of the second group were referred to the oncologist. Among the patients with RMI &lt;200, 137 (48,4%) endometriomas, 73 (25,8%) serous cystadenoma, 45 (15,9%) dermoid cysts, 22 (7,8%) paraovarian cysts, 2 (0,7%) adenocarcinoma were detected after histological examination. In patients with RMI &gt;200, 25% of benign ovarian tumors, 34,6% of borderline and 40,4% of malignant tumors were verified. </italic><bold><italic>Conclusions</italic></bold><italic>:</italic><italic> </italic><italic>RMI when used in the presence of a pelvic mass is a useful triage tool to determine those women who should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist. During laparoscopy, in cases of intraoperative malignancy suspicion staging should be performed: videorecord of the surgery, biopsy of the adnexal mass and contralateral ovary, biopsy of the omentum and peritoneum, and aspiration of the peritoneal fluid for cytological examination.</italic><italic/></p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Различные кистозные образования яичников диагностируют у 7,8% пациенток репродуктивного возраста и у 2,5–18% больных в постменопаузе. </italic><bold><italic>Цель исследования</italic></bold><italic>: изучить прогностическую значимость индекса малигнизации в сопоставлении с гистологическим заключением о характере кистозного образования яичника. </italic><bold><italic>Пациенты и методы</italic></bold><italic><bold>:</bold> в исследование было включено 345 пациенток с кистозными образованиями яичников. С учетом возраста пациенток, эхографических особенностей и содержания СА-125, до операции проводился расчет индекса малигнизации. </italic><bold><italic>Результаты</italic></bold><italic>: по результатам обследования пациентки были разделены на 2 группы. В первую группу было включено 283 (62%) жензины с показателем &lt;200, которые впоследствии были оперированы в условиях гинекологического отделения. Во вторую группу вошли 52 (38%) пациентки с индексом малигнизации &gt;200. Пациентки с повышенным индексом были направлены для консультации онкогинекологом и получили лечение в стационарах онкологического профиля. Согласно гистологическим заключениям, у женщин с индексом &lt;200 после хирургического вмешательства лапароскопическим доступом было обнаружено: эндометриоидные кисты — у 137 (48,4%), серозные цистаденомы — у 73 (25,8%), дермоидные кисты яичников — у 45 (15,9%), параовариальные кисты — у 22 (7,8%), аденокарцинома — у 2 (0,7%). У больных с повышенным индексом структура гистологических заключений существенно отличалась: доброкачественные образования были выявлены лишь в 25% случаев, в 75% диагностированы пограничные или злокачественные опухоли. </italic><bold><italic>Выводы</italic></bold><italic>: анализ полученных данных подтверждает информативность индекса малигнизации в качестве критерия злокачественности в предоперационной диагностике у пациенток с кистозными образованиями яичников. При выполнении оперативного вмешательства лапароскопическим доступом в стационаре общего профиля и при подозрении на злокачественность интраоперационными действиями врача являются: проведение видеозаписи операции, биопсия образования, биопсия контрлатерального яичника, сальника, подозрительных участков брюшины, а также забор перитонеальной жидкости для цитологического исследования. Результаты этих исследований позволят определить стадию заболевания и разработать оптимальную тактику ведения.</italic></p><p> </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>adnexal masses</kwd><kwd>risk of malignancy index</kwd><kwd>intraoperative strategy</kwd><kwd>oncogynecological aspects</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>кистозные образования яичников</kwd><kwd>индекс малигнизации</kwd><kwd>онко-гинекологические аспекты</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1.	Kuivasaari-Pirinen P, Anttila M. Ovarian cysts. Duodecim. 2011; 127 (17): 1857–1863.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2.	Zhordania K.I. Some aspects of diagnosis and ovarian cancer treatment. RMZh. Onkologiya = Breast cancer. Oncology. 2002; 10 (24): 1095–1102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3.	American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Management of adnexal masses. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2007. 14 p. (ACOG practice bulletin; no. 83). [116 references]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4.	Anton C., Carvalho F.M., Oliveira E.I. A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012; 67 (5): 437–441.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5.	Gelbaya T.A., Nardo L.G. Evidence-based management of endometrioma. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2011; 23 (1): 15–24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6.	Tsoumpou I., Kyrgiou M., Gelbaya T.A., Nardo L.G. The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2009; 92 (1): 75–87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7.	Krasnopol'skii V.I., Popov A.A., Slobodyanyuk B.A. Laparoscopy and Ovarian Cancer. Onkoginekologiya = Oncogynecology. 2012; 4: 69–73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8.	Tingulstad S., Hagen B., Skjeldestad F.E. et al: Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre-operative diagnosis of pelvic masses. Brit. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996; 103 (8): 826–831.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9.	Jacobs I., Oram D., Fairbanks J. et al. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Brit. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1990; 97: 922–929.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10.	Watcharada M., Pissamai Y. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 2009; 10: 865–868.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11.	Anton C., Carvalho F.M., Oliveira E.I. A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012; 67 (5): 437–441.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
