<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-6047</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2414-3545</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">130</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15690/vramn.v68i11.851</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SHORT MESSAGES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КРАТКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">VEGFRS IN NEOPLASTIC ANGIOGENESIS AND PROSPECTS FOR THERAPY ОF BRAIN TUMORS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>РОЛЬ РЕЦЕПТОРОВ VEGFR В НЕОПЛАСТИЧЕСКОМ АНГИОГЕНЕЗЕ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ ТЕРАПИИ ОПУХОЛЕЙ МОЗГА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Korchagina</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Корчагина</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>postgraduate of the Department of Medical nanobiotechnologies of N.I. Pirogov RRMU. Address: 1, Ostrovityanov Street, Moscow, RF, 117997, tel.: +7 (495) 434-13-01</p></bio><email>avilis1@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shein</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шеин</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, research scientist of the Laboratory of Neurochemistry of FSBI “V.P. Serbskii SSC of social and forensic psychiatry”. Address: 23, Kropotkinskii per., Moscow, RF, 119034, tel.: +7 (495) 695-02-62</p></bio><email>atomos@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gurina</surname><given-names>O. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гурина</surname><given-names>О. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Neurochemistry of FSBI “V.P. Serbskii SSC of social and forensic psychiatry”. Address: 23, Kropotkinskii per., Moscow, RF, 119034, tel.: +7 (495) 695-02-62</p></bio><email>olga672@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chekhonin</surname><given-names>V. P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чехонин</surname><given-names>В. П.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, professor, academician of RAMS, Head of the Department of Fundamental and applied neurobiology of FSBI “V.P. Serbskii SSC of social and forensic psychiatry”, Head of the Department of Medical nanobiotechnologies of N.I. Pirogov RRMU. Address: 23, Kropotkinskii per., Moscow, RF, 119034, tel.: +7 (495) 695-02-62</p></bio><email>chekhoninnew@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГНЦ социальной и судебной психиатрии им. В.П. Сербского, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation&#13;
Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова, Москва, Российская Федерация&#13;
ГНЦ социальной и судебной психиатрии им. В.П. Сербского, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-11-12" publication-format="electronic"><day>12</day><month>11</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>68</volume><issue>11</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii medetsinskikh nauk / Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</issue-title><fpage>104</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2015-08-07"><day>07</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 1970, "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 1970, Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1970</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/about/submissions</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/130">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/130</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common type of primary brain cancer that characterized by poor prognosis due to the rapid progression, active angiogenesis, enhanced tumor cell invasion and the emergence of resistance toward conventional therapy. In this connection, nowadays, new approaches for selective inhibition of crucial steps in tumor progression are actively developing. The key feature of tumor growth and development is angiogenesis. VEGF and its receptor VEGFR2 play the pivotal role in regulation of tumor vessel formation. Therefore, VEGFR2, as the main receptor of VEGF’s pro-angiogenic signal transducer, is a promising molecular target for anti-angiogenic therapy. There is evidence that inhibitors of VEGF and VEGFR2 reduce endothelial cell proliferation, migration and survival that lead to regression of vessel density and decrease vascular permeability, thereby slowing tumor growth. Currently, a number of VEGFR2 inhibitors are under clinical trials (ramucirumab, cediranib) and several were approved (sunitinib, sorafenib). Despite the promising results of preclinical studies, the efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in the clinical practice is significantly lower, mainly, due to rapid adaptation of malignant cells that consists of alternative pro-angiogenic pathways activation, recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells from bone marrow and increasing of the invasive growth. Given the diversity of pro-angiogenic mechanisms, enhancement of the efficacy of tumor therapy could be achieved by specific inhibition of VEGFR2 functions that will be supplemented by other antiangiogenic drugs (anti-VEGF,-PlGF,-HIF1α). In addition, multitargeting therapy should focus on the combined inhibition of angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, proliferation and survival of tumor cells.</italic></p><p> </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Ввиду</italic><italic> быстрой прогрессии, активного ангиогенеза, интенсивной инвазии и резистентности опухолей мозга</italic><italic>,</italic><italic> подходы </italic><italic>к </italic><italic>традиционной терапии остаются малоэффективными. В связи с этим активно изучают новые стратегии избирательного ингибирования критических стадий опухолевой прогрессии. Важнейшим фактором развития и роста солидных опухолей является неопластический ангиогенез, ключевую роль в регуляции которого играет фактор роста эндотелия сосудов (VEGF) и его рецептор </italic><italic>2-</italic><italic>го типа (VEGFR2). </italic><italic>Именно п</italic><italic>оэтому VEGFR2 как основной рецептор трансдукции проангиогенного сигнала рассматрива</italic><italic>ют</italic><italic> в качестве молекулярной мишени для антиангиогенной терапии. Ингибиторы VEGF и VEGFR2 подавляют пролиферацию, миграцию и выживаемость эндотелиоцитов, что приводит к регрессии сосудистой сети, снижению плотности и проницаемости сосудов</italic><italic>;</italic><italic> таким образом, замедля</italic><italic>ется</italic><italic> рост опухоли. В настоящее время ряд ингибиторов VEGFR2 (рамуцирумаб, цедираниб)</italic><italic> </italic><italic>проход</italic><italic>и</italic><italic>т клинические испытания. Несмотря на многообещающие результаты экспериментальных исследований, эффективность антиангиогенных препаратов в клини</italic><italic>ческой практике</italic><italic> оказывается существенно ниже. </italic><italic>Э</italic><italic>то связано </italic><italic>п</italic><italic>режде всего с адаптивной устойчивостью малигнизированных клеток, которая включает активацию альтернативных проангиогенных путей, рекрутирование предшественников эндотелиальных клеток из костного мозга и увеличение вклада инвазивного роста. Учитывая многообразие существующих проангиогенных сигнальных механизмов, для повышения эффективности противоопухолевой терапии специфическое подавление функций VEGFR2 необходимо дополнять другими антиангиогенными препаратами (анти-VEGF, -PlGF, -HIF1α). Кроме того, мультитаргетная стратегия должна быть направлена на комбинированное подавление ангиогенеза, инвазии, метастазирования, пролиферации и выживаемости опухолевых клеток.</italic></p><p> </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>VEGF</kwd><kwd>VEGFR2</kwd><kwd>angiogenesis</kwd><kwd>inhibitors of angiogenesis</kwd><kwd>brain tumors</kwd><kwd>site-directed therapy</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>VEGF</kwd><kwd>VEGFR2</kwd><kwd>ангиогенез</kwd><kwd>ингибиторы ангиогенеза</kwd><kwd>опухоли мозга</kwd><kwd>направленная терапия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1.	Norden A.D., Drappatz J., Wen P.Y. Antiangiogenic therapies for high-grade glioma. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2009; 5 (11): 610–620.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2.	Miletic H., Niclou S.P., Johansson M., Bjerkvig R. Anti-VEGF therapies for malignant glioma: treatment effects and escape mechanisms. Expert. Opin. 2009; 13(4): 455–468.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3.	Jain R.K., di Tomaso E., Duda D.G., Loeffler J.S., Sorensen A.G., Batchelor T.T. Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007; 8 (8): 610–622.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4.	Lakka S.S., Rao J.S. Antiangiogenic therapy in brain tumors. Exp. Rev. Neurother. 2008; 8 (10): 1457–1473.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5.	Stewart L.A. Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials. Lancet. 2002; 359 (9311): 1011–1018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6.	Zalutsky M.R. Current status of therapy of solid tumors: brain tumor therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2005; 1: 151–156.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7.	Gerstner E.R., Batchelor T.T. Antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma. Cancer J. 2012; 18 (1): 45–50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8.	Chekhonin V.P., Shein S.A., Korchagina A.A., Gurina O.I. VEGF in neoplastic angiogenesis. Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk. 2012; (2): 23–33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9.	Tong R.T., Boucher Y., Kozin S.V., Winkler F., Hicklin D.J., Jain R.K. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer. Res. 2004; 64: 3731–3736.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10.	Ferrara N., Gerber H.P., LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat. Med. 2003; 9 (6): 669–676.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11.	Ferrara N., Davis-Smyth T. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocr. Rev. 1997; 18 (1): 4–25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12.	Ferrara N. Molecular and biological properties of vascular endothelial growthfactor. J. Mol. Med. 1999; 77 (7): 527–543.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13.	Holmes K., Roberts O.L., Thomas A.M., Cross M.J. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: structure, function, intracellular signalling and therapeutic inhibition. Cell Signal. 2007; 19 (10): 2003–2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14.	Semenza G.L., Wang G.L. A nuclear factor induced by hypoxia via de novo protein synthesis binds to the human erythropoietin gene enhancer at a site required for transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992; 12: 5447–5454.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15.	Goel S., Duda D.G., Xu L., Munn L.L., Boucher Y., Fukumura D. et al. Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2011; 91 (3): 1071–1121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>16.	Lee S.L., Rouhi P., Dahl Jensen L., Zhang D., Ji H., Hauptmann G. et al. Hypoxia-induced pathological angiogenesis mediates tumor cell dissemination, invasion, and metastasis in a zebrafish tumor model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2009; 106 (46): 19485–19490.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>17.	Liu W., Xu J., Wang M. et al. Tumor-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-a facilitates tumor metastasis through the VEGF-VEGFR1 signaling pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 2011; 39 (5): 1213–1220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>18.	Jain R.K. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat. Med. 2001; 7 (9): 987–989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>19.	Jain R.K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science. 2005; 307 (5706): 58–62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>20.	Stohrer M., Boucher Y., Stangassinger M., Jain R.K. et al. Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated. Cancer. Res. 2000; 60: 4251–4255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>21.	Hubbard S.R. Autoinhibitory mechanisms in receptor tyrosine kinases. Front Biosci, 2002; 7: 330–340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>22.	Keyt B.A., Nguyen H.V., Berleau L.T., Duarte C.M., Park J., Chen H. et al. Identification of vascular ndothelial growth factor determinants for binding KDR and FLT-1 receptors. Generation of receptor-selective VEGF variants by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 5638–5646.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>23.	Shinkai A., Ito M., Anazawa H., Yamaguchi S. Shitara K., Shibuya M. et al. Mapping of the sites involved in ligand association and dissociation at the extracellular domain of the kinase insert domaincontaining receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 31283–31288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>24.	Heldin C.H., Westermark B. Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol. Rev. 1999; 79 (4): 1283–1316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>25.	Ruch C., Skiniotis G., Steinmetz M.O., Walz T., Ballmer-Hofer K. et al. Structure of a VEGF-VEGF receptor complex determined by electron microscopy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007; 14 (3): 249–250.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>26.	Kappert K., Peters K.G., Bohmer F.D., Ostman A. et al. Tyrosine phosphatases in vessel wall signaling. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005; 65(3): 587–598.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>27.	Ewan L.C., Jopling H.M., Jia H., Mittar S., Bagherzadeh A., Howell G.J. et al. Intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity is required for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 ubiquitination, sorting and degradation in endothelial cells. Traffic. 2006; 7 (9): 1270–1282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>28.	Koch S., Tugues S., Li X., Gualandi L., Claesson-Welsh L. et al. Signal transduction by vascular endothelial growth receptors. Biochem. J. 2011; 437: 169–183.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>29.	Jakobsson L., Kreuger J., Holmborn K., Lundin L., Eriksson I., Kjellén L. et al. Heparan sulfate in trans potentiates VEGFR-mediated angiogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2006; 10 (5): 625–634.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>30.	Grosskreutz C.L., Anand-Apte B., Duplaa C., Quinn T.P., Terman B.I., Zetter B. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced migration of vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Microvasc. Res. 1999; 58 (2): 128–136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>31.	Sawano A., Iwai S., Sakurai Y., Ito M., Shitara K., Nakahata T. et al. Flt-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, is a novel cell surface marker for the lineage of monocyte-macrophages in humans. Blood. 2001; 97 (3): 785–791.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>32.	Hiratsuka S., Minowa O., Kuno J., Noda T., Shibuya M. Flt-1 lacking the tyrosine kinase domain is sufficient for normal development and angiogenesis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998; 95 (16): 9349–9354.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>33.	Fong G. H., Rossant J., Gertsenstein M., Breitman M.L. Role of the Flt-1 receptor tyrosine kinase in regulating the assembly ofvascular endothelium. Nature. 1995; 376 (6535): 66–70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>34.	Wang F., Yamauchi M., Muramatsu M., Osawa T., Tsuchida R., Shibuya M. RACK1 regulates VEGF/Flt1-mediated cell migration via activation of a PI3-K/Akt pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011; 286 (11): 9097–9106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>35.	Cai J., Ahmad S., Jiang W.G., Huang J., Kontos C.D., Boulton M. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 sustains angiogenesis and Bcl-2 expression via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in endothelial cells. Diabetes.2003; 52 (12): 2959–2968.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>36.	Taylor A. P., Leon E., Goldenberg D. Placental growth factor (PlGF) enhances breast cancer cell motility by mobilising ERK1/2 phosphorylation and cytoskeletal rearrangement. Brit. J. Cancer. 2010; 103 (1): 82–89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>37.	Wey J.S., Fan F., Gray M.J., Bauer T.W., McCarty M.F., Somcio R. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 promotes migration and invasion in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer. 2005; 104: 427–438.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>38.	Lyden D., Hattori K., Dias S. et al. Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nature Med. 2001; 7: 1194–1201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>39.	Shibuya M. Differential roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and receptor-2 in angiogenesis. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006; 39 (5): 469–478.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>40.	Meyer R.D., Mohammadi M., Rahimi N. A single amino acid substitution in the activation loop defines the decoy characteristic of VEGFR-1/FLT-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2006; 281: 867–875.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>41.	Rahimi N., Dayanir V., Lashkari K. Receptor chimeras indicate that the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) modulates mitogenic activity of VEGFR-2 in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275 (22): 16986–16992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>42.	Autiero M., Waltenberger J., Communi D., Kranz A., Moons L., Lambrechts D. et al. Role of PlGF in the intra- and intermolecular cross talk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1. Nat. Med. 2003; 9: 936–943.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>43.	Cleaver O., Melton D.A. Endothelial signaling during development. Nat. Med. 2003; 9:661–668.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>44.	Shalaby F., Rossant J., Yamaguchi T.P., Gertsenstein M., Wu X.F., Breitman M.L. et al. Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice. Nature. 1995; 376: 62–66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>45.	Hicklin D.J., Ellis L.M. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005; 23: 1011–1027.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>46.	Oelrichs R.B., Reid H.H., Bernard O., Ziemiecki A., Wilks A.F. NYK/FLK-1: a putative receptor protein tyrosine kinase isolated from E10 embryonic neuroepithelium is expressed in endothelial cells of the developing embryo. Oncogene. 1993; 8: 11–18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>47.	Maharaj A.S., Saint-Geniez M., Maldonado A.E., D'Amore P.A. Vascular endothelial growth factor localization in the adult. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 639–648.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>48.	Smith N.R., Baker D., James N.H., Ratcliffe K., Jenkins M., Ashton S.E. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 are localized primarily to the vasculature in human primary solid cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 3548–3561.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>49.	Zozulia U., Vasilyeva I., Slin’ko E., Chopick N. Comparative study of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 expression in spinal tumors. Ukr. Neurosci. J. 2001; 3: 85–92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>50.	Plate K.H., Breier G., Millauer B., Ullrich A., Risau W. Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor and its cognate receptors in a rat glioma model of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer. Res. 1993; 53 (23): 5822–5827.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>51.	Podar K., Anderson K.C. The pathophysiologic role of VEGF in hematologic malignancies: therapeutic implications. Blood. 2005; 105: 1383–1395.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>52.	Dias S., Hattori K., Zhu Z., Heissig B., Choy M., Lane W. et al. Autocrine stimulation of VEGFR-2 activates human leukemic cell growth and migration. J. Clin. Invest. 2000; 106 (4): 511–521.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>53.	Hicklin D.J., Ellis L.M. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005; 23: 1011–1027.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>54.	Calvani M., Rapisarda A., Uranchimeg B., Shoemaker R.H., Melillo G. Hypoxic induction of an HIF-1alpha-dependent bFGF autocrine loop drives angiogenesis in human endothelial cells. Blood. 2006; 107: 2705–2712.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>55.	Waldner M.J., Wirtz S., Jefremow A., Warntjen M., Neufert C., Atreya R. et al. VEGF receptor signaling links inflammation and tumorigenesis in colitis-associated cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2010; 207: 2855–2868.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>56.	Motzer R.J., Michaelson M.D., Redman B.G., Hudes G.R., Wilding G., Figlin R.A. et al. Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006; 24: 16–24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>57.	de Bouard S., Herlin P., Christensen J.G., Lemoisson E., Gauduchon P., Raymond E. et al. Antiangiogenic and anti-invasive effects of sunitinib on experimental human glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2007; 9: 412–423.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>58.	Tvorogov D, Anisimov A., Zheng W., Leppänen V.M., Tammela T., Laurinavicius S. et al. Effective suppression of vascular network formation by combination of antibodies blocking VEGFR ligand binding and receptor dimerization. Cancer Cell. 2010; 18: 630–640.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>59.	Spratlin J. Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B): Monoclonal antibody inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. Curr. Oncol .Rep. 2011; 13 (2): 97–102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>60.	Spratlin J.L., Mulder K.E., Mackey J.R. Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B): a novel attack on angiogenesis. Future Oncol. 2010; 6 (7): 1085–1094.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>61.	Krupitskaya Y., Wakelee H.A. Ramucirumab, a fully human mAb to the transmembrane signaling tyrosine kinase VEGFR-2 for the potential treatment of cancer. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2009; 10(6): 597–605.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>62.	Ton N.C., Parker G.J., Jackson A., Mullamitha S., Buonaccorsi G.A., Roberts C. et al. Phase I evaluation of CDP791, a PEGylated di-Fab' conjugate that binds vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007; 13 (23): 7113–7118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>63.	Hansen-Algenstaedt N., Stoll B.R., Padera T.P., Dolmans D.E., Hicklin D.J., Fukumura D. et al. Tumor oxygenation in hormone-dependent tumors during vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 blockade, hormone ablation, and chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 4556–4560.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>64.	Juan T.Y., Roffler S.R., Hou H.S., Huang S.M., Chen K.C., Leu Y.L. et al. Antiangiogenesis targeting tumor microenvironment synergizes glucuronide prodrug antitumor activity. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 4600–4611.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>65.	Kozin S.V., Boucher Y., Hicklin D.J., Bohlen P., Jain R.K., Suit H.D. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2-blocking antibody potentiates radiation-induced long-term control of human tumor xenografts. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 39–44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>66.	Winkler F., Kozin S.V., Tong R.T., Chae S.S., Booth M.F., Garkavtsev I. et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell. 2004; 6: 553–563.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>67.	Sullivan L.A., Brekken R.A. The VEGF family in cancer and antibody-based strategies for their inhibition. MAbs. 2010; 2 (2): 165–175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>68.	Kim K.J., Li B., Winer J., Armanini M., Gillett N., Phillips H.S. et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo. Nature. 1993; 362: 841–844.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>69.	Carmeliet P., Jain R.K. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000; 407: 249–257.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>70.	Keunen O., Johansson M., Oudin A., Sanzey M., Rahim S.A., Fack F. et al. Anti-VEGF treatment reduces blood supply and increases tumor cell invasion in glioblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2011; 108 (9): 3749–3754.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>71.	Roodink I., Leenders W.P. Targeted therapies of cancer: angiogenesis inhibition seems not enough. Cancer Lett. 2010; 299(1): 1–10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>72.	Bergers G., Hanahan D. Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008; 8 (8): 592–603.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>73.	di Tomaso E., London N., Fuja D., Logie J., Tyrrell J.A., Kamoun W. et al. PDGF-C induces maturation of blood vessels in a model of glioblastoma and attenuates the response to anti-VEGF treatment. PLoS One. 2009; 4 (4): е5123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>74.	Batchelor T.T. Sorensen A.G., di Tomaso E., Ryg P.A., Loeffler J.S., Sorensen A.G. et al. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell. 2007; 11 (1): 83–95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>75.	Mizukami Y, Jo W.S., Duerr E.M., Gala M., Li J., Zhang X. et al. Induction of interleukin-8 preserves the angiogenic response in HIF-1 α-deficient colon cancer cells. Nature Med. 2005; 11: 992–997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>76.	Ali M.M., Janic B., Babajani-Feremi A., Varma N.R., Iskander A.S., Anagli J. et al. Changes in vascular permeability and expression of different angiogenic factors following anti-angiogenic treatment in rat glioma. PLoS One. 2010; 5 (1): 8727.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>77.	Fan F., Samuel S., Gaur P., Lu J., Dallas N.A., Xia L. et al. Chronic exposure of colorectal cancer cells to bevacizumab promotes compensatory pathways that mediate tumour cell migration. Brit. J. Cancer. 2011; 104 (8): 1270–1277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>78.	Song S., Ewald A.J., Stallcup W. Werb Z., Bergers G. PDGFRβ + perivascular progenitor cells in tumours regulate pericyte differentiation and vascular survival. Nature Cell. Biol. 2005; 7: 870–879.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>79.	Du R., Lu K.V., Petritsch C., Liu P., Ganss R., Passegué E. et al. HIF1α induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived vascular modulatory cells to regulate tumor angiogenesis and invasion. Cancer Cell. 2008; 13 (3): 206–220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>80.	Wang R., Chadalavada K., Wilshire J., Kowalik U., Hovinga K.E., Geber A. et al. Glioblastoma stem-like cells give rise to tumour endothelium. Nature. 2010; 468 (7325): 829–833.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>81.	Ricci-Vitiani L., Pallini R., Biffoni M., Todaro M., Invernici G., Cenci T. et al. Tumour vascularization via endothelial differentiation of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Nature. 2010; 468 (7325): 824–828.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>82.	Hendriksen E.M., Span P.N., Schuuring J., Peters J.P., Sweep F.C., van der Kogel A.J. et al. Angiogenesis, hypoxia and VEGF expression during tumour growth in a human xenograft tumour model. Microvasc. Res. 2009; 77 (2): 96–103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>83.	Robey R.B., Hay N. Is Akt the «Warburg kinase»?-Akt-energy metabolism interactions and oncogenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2009; 19 (1): 25–31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>84.	Yu J.L., Rak J.W., Coomber B.L., Hicklin D.J., Kerbel R.S. Effect of p53 status on tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy. Science. 2002; 295 (5559): 1526–1528.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>85.	Calabrese C., Poppleton H., Kocak M., Hogg T.L., Fuller C., Hamner B. et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2007; 11 (1): 69–82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>86.	Paez-Ribes M., Allen E., Hudock J., Takeda T., Okuyama H., Viñals F. et al. Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2009; 15 (3): 220–231.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>87.	Ebos J.M., Lee C.R., Cruz-Munoz W., Bjarnason G.A., Christensen J.G., Kerbel R.S. Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2009; 15 (3): 232–239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>88.	Bikfalvi A., Moenner M., Javerzat S., North S., Hagedorn M. Inhibition of angiogenesis and the angiogenesis/invasion shift. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2011; 39 (6): 1560–1564.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>89.	Lucio-Eterovic A.K., Piao Y., de Groot J.F. Mediators of glioblastoma resistance and invasion during antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009; 15 (14): 4589–4599.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>90.	Wu X., Northcott P.A., Dubuc A., Dupuy A.J., Shih D.J., Witt H. et al. Clonal selection drives genetic divergence of metastatic medulloblastoma. Nature. 2012; 482 (7386): 529–533.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>91.	Lyden D., Hattori K., Dias S., Costa C., Blaikie P., Butros L. et al. Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nat. Med. 2001; 7 (11): 1194–1201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>92.	Shibuya M. Differential roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and receptor-2 in angiogenesis. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006; 39 (5): 469–478.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>93.	Salhia B., Angelov L., Roncari L., Wu X., Shannon P., Guha A. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by reactive astrocytes and associated neoangiogenesis. Brain. Res. 2000; 883 (1): 87–97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>94.	Wuestefeld R., Chen J., Meller K., Brand-Saberi B., Theiss C. Impact of vegf on astrocytes: analysis of gap junctional intercellular communication, proliferation, and motility. Glia. 2012; 60 (6): 936–947.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>95.	Ma Y., Shurin G.V., Gutkin, D. W., Shurin M.R. Tumor associated regulatory dendritic cells. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2012; 22 (4): 298–306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><mixed-citation>96.	Gabrilovich D., Ishida T., Oyama T., Ran S., Kravtsov V., Nadaf S. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits the development of dendritic cells and dramatically affects the differentiation of multiple hematopoietic lineages in vivo. Blood. 1998; 92: 4150–4166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><mixed-citation>97.	Chaux P., Moutet M., Faivre J., Martin F., Martin M. Inflammatory cells infiltrating human colorectal carcinomas express HLA class II but not B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecules of the T-cell activation. Lab. Invest. 1996; 74 (5): 975–983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><mixed-citation>98.	Caraglia M., De Rosa G., Salzano G., Santini D., Lamberti M., Sperlongano P. et al. Nanotech revolution for the anti-cancer drug delivery through blood-brain-barrier. Curr. Cancer Drug. Targets. 2012; 12 (3): 186–196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B99"><label>99.</label><mixed-citation>99.	Zhan C., Lu W. The blood-brain/tumor barriers: challenges and chances for malig-nant gliomas targeted drug delivery. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012; 13 (12): 2380–2387.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B100"><label>100.</label><mixed-citation>100.	Chekhonin V.P., Baklaushev V.P., Iusubalieva G.M., Volgina N.E., Gurina O.I. Fundamental and applied aspects of the hematoencephalic barrier research. Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk. 2012; (8): 66–78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B101"><label>101.</label><mixed-citation>101.	Zhou J., Atsina K.B., Himes B.T., Strohbehn G.W., Saltzman W.M. Novel delivery strategies for glioblastoma. Cancer J. 2012; 18 (1): 89–99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B102"><label>102.</label><mixed-citation>102.	Chekhonin V.P., Baklaushev V.P., Yusubalieva G.M., Belorusova A.E., Gulyaev M.V., Tsitrin E.B. et al. Targeted delivery of liposomal nanocontainers to the peritumoral zone of glioma by means of monoclonal antibodies against GFAP and the extracellular loop of Cx43. Nanomedicine. 2012; 8 (1): 83–70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B103"><label>103.</label><mixed-citation>103.	Chekhonin V.P., Baklaushev V.P., Yusubalieva G.M., Gurina O.I., Dmitrieva T.B. A targeted transport of 125I-labeled monoclonal antibodies to target proteins in experimental glioma focus. Doklady Biochem. i Biophys. 2008; 418 (5): 1–4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B104"><label>104.</label><mixed-citation>104.	Сhekhonin V.P., Baklaushev V.P., Yusubalieva G.M., Gurina O.I. Targeted Transport of 125I-Labeled Antibody to GFAP and AMVB1 in an Experimental Rat Model of C6 Glioma. J. Neur.Pharmacol. 2009; 4 (1): 28–34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B105"><label>105.</label><mixed-citation>105.	Сhekhonin V.P., Dmitrieva T.B., Zhirkov U.A., Kabanov A.V., Gendel'man Kh. E. Nanosystems and targeted transport of medicinal preparations to the brain. Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk = Annual of Academy of Medical sciences. 2009; 2: 32–40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B106"><label>106.</label><mixed-citation>106.	Lebedev S.V., Petrov S.V., Volkov A.I., Chekhonin V.P. The translocation of macromolecules via the hematoencephalic barrier. Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk = Annual of Academy of Medical sciences. 2007; 6: 37–49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B107"><label>107.</label><mixed-citation>107.	Ogunshola O.O., Stewart W.B., Mihalcik V., Solli T., Madri J.A., Ment L.R. Neuronal VEGF expression correlates with angiogenesis in postnatal developing rat brain. Brain. Res. 2000; 119 (1): 139–153.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B108"><label>108.</label><mixed-citation>108.	Argaw A.T., Asp L., Zhang J., Navrazhina K., Pham T., Mariani J.N. et al. Astrocyte-derived VEGF-A drives blood-brain barrier disruption in CNS inflammatory disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2012; 122 (7): 2454–2468.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B109"><label>109.</label><mixed-citation>109.	Dejana E., Tournier-Lasserve E., Weinstein B.M. The control of vascular integrity by endothelial cell junctions: molecular basis and pathological implications. Dev. Cell. 2009; 16: 09–221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B110"><label>110.</label><mixed-citation>110.	Srikanth M., Kessler J.A. Nanotechnology-novel therapeutics for CNS disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012; 8 (6): 307–318.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B111"><label>111.</label><mixed-citation>111.	Duggan S.T.; Keating G.M. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: a review of its use in metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer, multiple myeloma and AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. Drugs. 2011; 71 (18): 2531–2558.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B112"><label>112.</label><mixed-citation>112.	Chang H.I., Yeh M.K. Clinical development of liposome-based drugs: formulation, characterization, and therapeutic efficacy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012; 7: 49–60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B113"><label>113.</label><mixed-citation>113.	Lingappa M., Song H., Thompson S., Bruchertseifer F., Morgenstern A., Sgouros G. Immunoliposomal delivery of 213Bi for alpha-emitter targeting of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010; 70 (17): 6815–6823.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B114"><label>114.</label><mixed-citation>114.	Feng B., Tomizawa K., Michiue H., Han X.J., Miyatake S., Matsui H. Development of a bifunctional immunoliposome system for combined drug delivery and imaging in vivo. Biomaterials. 2010; 31 (14): 4139–4145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B115"><label>115.</label><mixed-citation>115.	Abakumov M.A., Shein S.A., Vishvasrao H., Nukolova N.V., Sokol'ski-Papkov M., Sandalova T.O. et al. Visualization of experimental glioma C6 by MRI with magnetic nanoparticles conjugated with monoclonal antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor. Bull. Exp. Biol .Med. 2012; 154 (8): 242–246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B116"><label>116.</label><mixed-citation>116.	Wicki A., Rochlitz C., Orleth A., Ritschard R., Albrecht I., Herrmann R. et al. Targeting tumor-associated endothelial cells: anti-VEGFR2 immunoliposomes mediate tumor vessel disruption and inhibit tumor growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012; 18 (2): 454–464.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B117"><label>117.</label><mixed-citation>117.	Ebos J.M., Bocci G., Man S., Thorpe P.E., Hicklin D.J., Zhou D. et al. A naturally occurring soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 detected in mouse and human plasma. Mol. Cancer Res. 2004; 2 (6): 315–326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B118"><label>118.</label><mixed-citation>118.	Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011; 144 (5): 646–674.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B119"><label>119.</label><mixed-citation>119.	Erber R., Thurnher A., Katsen A.D., Groth G., Kerger H., Hammes H.P. et al. Combined inhibition of VEGF and PDGF signaling enforces tumor vessel regression by interfering with pericyte-mediated endothelial cell survival mechanisms. FASEB J. 2004; 18 (2): 338–340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B120"><label>120.</label><mixed-citation>120.	Hiratsuka S., Duda D.G., Huang Y., Goel S., Sugiyama T., Nagasawa T. et al. C-X-C receptor type 4 promotes metastasis by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in myeloid differentiation antigen (Gr-1)-positive cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2011; 108 (1): 302–307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B121"><label>121.</label><mixed-citation>121.	Rapisarda A., Hollingshead M., Uranchimeg B. et al. Increased antitumor activity of bevacizumab in combination with hypoxia inducible factor-1 inhibition. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009; 8 (7): 1867–1877.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B122"><label>122.</label><mixed-citation>122.	Chekhonin V.P., Shein S.A., Korchagina A.A., Gurina O.I. et al. VEGF in tumor progression and targeted therapy. Curr. Cancer Drug .Targets. 2013; 13 (4): 423–443.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
