<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-6047</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2414-3545</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">102</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15690/vramn.v68i12.854</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ONCOLOGY: CURRENT ISSUES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ОНКОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VASCULARIZATION DEGREE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA AND FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA OF THE LIVER ACCORDING TO COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ СТЕПЕНИ ВАСКУЛЯРИЗАЦИИ ГЕПАТОЦЕЛЛЮЛЯРНОГО РАКА И ОЧАГОВОЙ УЗЛОВОЙ ГИПЕРПЛАЗИИ ПЕЧЕНИ ПО ДАННЫМ КОМПЬЮТЕРНО-ТОМОГРАФИЧЕСКОГО И МОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tumanova</surname><given-names>U. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Туманова</surname><given-names>У. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>clinical physician of the Department of Imaging methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of FSBI “A.V. Vishnevskii Surgery Institute”, junior research scientist of the 2nd Department of Morbid anatomy of FSBI “V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology”. Address: 27, B. Serpukhovskaya Street, Moscow, RF, 117997; tel.: +7 (495) 237-37-64</p></bio><email>u.n.tumanova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Karmazanovskii</surname><given-names>G. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кармазановский</surname><given-names>Г. Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, professor, Head of the Department of Imaging methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of FSBI “A.V. Vishnevskii Surgery Institute”. Address: 27, B. Serpukhovskaya Street, Moscow, RF, 117997; tel.: +7 (495) 237-37-64</p></bio><email>karmazanovsky@ixv.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dubova</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дубова</surname><given-names>Е. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, senior research scientist of the 2nd Department of Morbid anatomy of FSBI “V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology”. Address: 4, Akad. Oparin Street, Moscow, RF, 117997; tel.: +7 (495) 438-28-92</p></bio><email>e_dubova@oparina4.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shchegolev</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Щеголев</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, professor, Head of the 2nd Department of Morbid anatomy of FSBI “V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology”. Address: 4, Akad. Oparin Street, Moscow, RF, 117997; tel.: +7 (495) 438-28-92</p></bio><email>ashegolev@oparina4.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Russian Ministry of Healthcare,&#13;
Moscow, Russian Federation&#13;
Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perina-tology, Russian Ministry of Healthcare, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Институт хирургии им. А.В. Вишневского» Минздрава России,&#13;
Москва, Российская Федерация&#13;
ФГБУ «Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова» Минздрава России, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Russian Ministry of Healthcare,&#13;
Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Институт хирургии им. А.В. Вишневского» Минздрава России,&#13;
Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perina-tology, Russian Ministry of Healthcare, Moscow, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова» Минздрава России, Москва, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-12-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>68</volume><issue>12</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii medetsinskikh nauk / Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук</issue-title><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2015-08-07"><day>07</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 1970, "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 1970, Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1970</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">"Paediatrician" Publishers LLC</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Издательство "Педиатръ"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/about/submissions</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/102">https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/102</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><italic>A comparative analysis of vascularization degree of hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver according to the multislice computed tomography and histological study of tissue is presented. It was established that computed tomography with bolus contrast enhancement allows to study the characteristics of blood supply of the liver and focal formations. Frequently only the use of this method helps to evaluate specific morphological structure of tumors - hepatocellular carcinoma or focal nodular hyperplasia. As an additional differential diagnostic feature is recommended to increase the density determination of tissue formation in the arterial phase computed tomography study. The maximum of vascularization by computed tomography and immunohistochemistry (with antibodies CD34) are installed in a tissue of highly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma.</italic></p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Проведен сравнительный анализ степени васкуляризации гепатоцеллюлярного рака и очаговой узловой гиперплазии печени по данным мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии и гистологического исследования ткани образований. Установлено, что использование компьютерной томографии с болюсным контрастным усилением позволяет изучить особенности кровоснабжения очаговых образований печени и часто только по данным этого исследования решить вопрос о конкретной морфологической структуре новообразования – гепатоцеллюлярный рак или очаговая узловая гиперплазия. В качестве дополнительного дифференциально-диагностического признака рекомендуется определение прироста плотности ткани образования в артериальную фазу компьютерно-томографического исследования. Максимальные значения степени васкуляризации по данным компьютерной томографии и иммуногистохимического исследования (с антителами CD34) установлены в ткани высокодифференцированного гепатоцеллюлярного рака.</italic></p><p> </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>vascularity</kwd><kwd>hepatocellular carcinoma</kwd><kwd>computed tomography</kwd><kwd>focal nodular hyperplasia</kwd><kwd>liver</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>васкуляризация</kwd><kwd>гепатоцеллюлярный рак</kwd><kwd>компьютерная томография</kwd><kwd>очаговая узловая гиперплазия</kwd><kwd>печень</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1.	Sharma S., Sharma M.C., Sarkar C. Morphology of angiogenesis in human cancer: a conceptual overview, histoprognostic perspective and significance of neoangiogenesis. Histopathology. 2005; 46 (5): 481-489.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2.	Francis I.R., Cohan R.H., McNulty N.J., Platt J.F., Korobkin M., Gebremariam A., Ragupathi K.I. Multidetector CT of the liver and hepatic neoplasms: effect of multi-phasic imaging on tumor conspicuity and vascular enhancement. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003; 180 (5): 1217-1224.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3.	Kim Y., Stolarska M.A., Othmer H.G. The role of the microenvironment in tumor growth and invasion. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2011; 106 (2): 353-379.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4.	Folkman J. Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2007; 6 (4): 273-286.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5.	Karmazanovskii G.G. Spiral computed tomography with bolus con-contrast sub- gain in abdominal surgery. Part 1. Preoperative di-agnostic. Med. vizualizatsiya = Medical visualization. 2004; 2: 1–25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6.	Quaia E., D’Onofrio M., Palumbo A., Rossi S., Bruni S., Cova M. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus baseline ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in metastatic disease of the liver: diagnostic performance and confidence. Eur. Radiol. 2006; 16 (7): 1599-1609.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7.	Shinmura R., Matsui O., Kadoya M., Kobayashi S., Terayama N., Sanada J., De-machi H., Gabata T. Detection of hypervascular malignant foci in borderline lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of dynamic multi-detector row CT, dynamic MR imaging and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18 (9): 1918-1924.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8.	Grazioli L., Morana G., Kirchin M.A., Schneider G. Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology. 2005; 236 (1): 166-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9.	Bruix J., Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005; 42 (5): 1208-1236.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10.	Colombo M., Raoul J.L., Lencioni R., Galle P.R., Zucman-Rossi J., Bañares R., See-hofer D., Neuhaus P., Johnson P. Multidisciplinary strategies to improve treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma: a European perspective. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013; 25 (6): 639-651.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11.	Wong T.C., Lo C.M. Resection strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin. Liver Dis. 2013; 33 (3): 273-281.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12.	Theise N.D., Curado M.P., Franceschi S., Hytiroglou P., Kudo M., Park Y.N., Saka-moto M., Torbenson M., Wee A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Eds. Bosman F.T., Carneiro F., Hruban R.H., Theise N.D. Lyon: IARC, 2010; 205-216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13.	Yu De-cai, Chen Jun, Sun Xi-tai, Zhuang Lin-yuan, Jiang Chun-ping, Ding Yi-tao Mechanism of endothelial progenitor cell recruitment into neo-vessels in adjacent non-tumor tissues in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2010; 10: 435.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14.	Albrecht T., Blomley M., Bolondi L., Claudon M., Correas J.M., Cosgrove D., Greiner L., Jäger K., Jong N.D., Leen E., Lencioni R., Lindsell D., Martegani A., Solbiati L., Thorelius L., Tranquart F., Weskott H.P., Whittingham T.; EFSUMB Study Group. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004. Ultraschall. Med. 2004; 25 (4): 249-256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15.	Ma X., Samir A.E., Holalkere N.-S., Sahani D.V. Optimal arterial phase imaging for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma determined by continuous image capture on 16-MDCT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008; 191 (3); 772-777.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>16.	Silva A.C., Evans J.M., McCullough A.E., Jatoi M.A., Vargas H.E., Hara A.K. MR Imaging of hypervascular liver masses: A review of current techniques. Radio Graph-ics. 2009; 29 (2): 385-402.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>17.	Paulson E.K., McDermott V.G., Keogan M.T., DeLong D.M., Frederick M.G., Nel-son R.C. Carcinoid metastases to the liver: role of triple-phase helical CT. Radiology. 1998; 206 (1): 143-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>18.	Albiin N. MRI of focal liver lesions. Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 2012; 8 (2): 107-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>19.	Gaiani S., Celli N., Piscaglia F., Cecilioni L., Losinno F., Giangregorio F., Mancini M., Pini P., Fornari F., Bolondi L. Usefulness of contrastenhanced perfusional sono-graphy in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma hypervascular at spiral computed tomography. J. Hepatol. 2004; 41 (3): 421-426.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>20.	Lin M.C., Tsay P.K., Ko S.F., Lui K.W., Tseng J.H., Hung C.F., Hsueh C., Wan Y.L. Triphasic dynamic CT findings of 63 hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia in 46 patients: Correlation with size and pathological findings. Abdom. Imaging. 2008; 33 (3): 301-307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>21.	Luo W., Numata K., Morimoto M., Kondo M., Takebayashi S., Okada M., Morita S., Tanaka K. Focal liver tumors: characterization with 3D perflubutane microbubble contrast agent-enhanced US versus 3D contrast-enhanced multidetector CT. Radiology. 2009; 251 (1): 287-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>22.	Kin M., Torimura T., Ueno T. Inuzuka S, Tanikawa K. Sinusoidal capillarization in small hepatocellular carcinoma. Pathol. Int. 1994; 44 (10-11): 771-778.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>23.	Nakashima Y., Nakashima O., Hsia C.C., Kojiro M., Tabor E. Vascularization of small hepatocellular carcinomas: correlation with differentiation. Liver. 1999; 19 (1): 12-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>24.	Tanaka S., Kitamura T., Fujita M., Nakanishi K., Okuda S. Color Doppler flow imaging of liver tumors. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990; 154 (3): 509-514.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>25.	Jang H-J., Lim H.K., Lee W.J. Kim S.H., Kim M.J., Choi D., Lee S.J., Lim J.H. Fo-cal Hepatic Lesions: Evaluation with contrast enhanced gray scale harmonic US. Korean J. Radiol. 2003; 4 (2): 91-100.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
