Clinical and cost effectiveness of coronary angiography for the primary diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease with low and moderate pretest probability

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. The detection rate of obstructive changes in the coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) during invasive examination remains low, resulting in an unjustified increase in the burden on healthcare facilities. A study of the clinical and cost effectiveness of strategies for the primary diagnosis of CAD determines the prospects for optimizing patient routing processes and reducing costs in the healthcare system.

Aims — to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with suspected obstructive CAD.

Methods. The retrospective study included 620 patients with low and moderate pretest probability (PTP) of CAD aged ≥ 18 years who underwent elective ICA at the Almazov National Medical Research Centrе from January to May 2025. According to the results of ICA, CAD was considered obstructive if coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% was detected. To carry out economic calculations based on the results of ICA, two groups of patients were formed. The first group consisted of 335 patients with obstructive CAD, and the second group consisted of 285 patients without obstructive changes in the coronary arteries. Direct medical costs for inpatient ICA were calculated. The potential costs of a diagnostic strategy using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were assessed as a comparison method. Cost effectiveness analysis was performed using the tariff method of cost estimation and the cost minimization method.

Results. The clinical effectiveness of ICA in the examined cohort of patients with suspected CAD was 54%. Myocardial revascularization was performed in 38.1% of cases. An invasive strategy for the primary diagnosis of CAD is less effective than CCTA. Using a noninvasive approach, cost savings reach 17.7% of the total cost of ICA.

Conclusions. In real clinical practice, the detection rate of obstructive CAD remains low during routine invasive examination. This study demonstrates the lack of cost effectiveness of the invasive approach in patients with suspected CAD. Non-invasive CCTA in low and moderate PTP of obstructive CAD may be a promising tool for optimizing the clinical and cost effectiveness of algorithms for verifying coronary atherosclerosis by reducing the number of ICA and increasing its diagnostic value.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yuriy A. Kudaev

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Author for correspondence.
Email: kudaev51@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2111-0765
SPIN-code: 5777-8873

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Natalya L. Lokhovinina

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: lokhovinina_nl@almazovcentre.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9579-061X
SPIN-code: 3245-9718

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Inga T. Abesadze

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: abesadze_it@almazovcentre.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2322-327X
SPIN-code: 6978-3167

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Marianna Z. Alugishvili

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: alugishvili_mz@almazovcentre.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9397-655X
SPIN-code: 1333-9129

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Elena S. Klokova

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: el-se-k@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3991-7740
SPIN-code: 4662-6333
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Aleksey V. Panov

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: panov_av@almazovcentre.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3356-3873
SPIN-code: 5103-6363

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Yan W, Hua Y. Trends in deaths and disability-adjusted life-years of ischemic heart disease attributable to high body-mass index worldwide, 1990–2019. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024;24(1):482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04136-y
  2. Окладников С.М., Никитина С.Ю., Андреев Е.М., и др. Демографический ежегодник России. 2023: стат. сб. — М.: Росстат, 2023. — С. 256. [Okladnikov SM, Nikitina SYu, Andreev EM, et al. The Demographic Yearbook of Russia. 2023: Statistical Handbook. Moscow: Rosstat; 2023. P. 256. (In Russ.)]
  3. Окладников С.М., Никитина С.Ю., Александрова Г.А., и др. Здравоохранение в России. 2023: стат. сб. — М.: Росстат, 2023. — С. 179. [Okladnikov SM, Nikitina SYu, Alexandrova GA, et al. Healthcare in Russia. 2023: Statistical Handbook. Moscow: Rosstat; 2023. P. 179. (In Russ.)]
  4. Концевая А.В., Муканеева Д.К., Игнатьева В.И., и др. Экономика профилактики сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний в Российской Федерации // Российский кардиологический журнал. — 2023. — Т. 28. — № 9. — С. 19–26. [Kontsevaya AV, Mukaneeva DK, Ignatieva VI, et al. Economics of cardiovascular prevention in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(9):19–26. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5521
  5. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
  6. Nissen L, Winther S, Schmidt M, et al. Implementation of coronary computed tomography angiography as nationally recommended first-line test in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome: impact on the use of invasive coronary angiography and revascularization. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(12):1353–1362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa197
  7. Becker LM, Peper J, Verhappen BJLA, et al. Real world impact of added FFR-CT to coronary CT angiography on clinical decision-making and patient prognosis — IMPACT FFR study. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(8):5465–5475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09517-z
  8. Барбараш О.Л., Карпов Ю.А., Панов А.В., и др. Стабильная ишемическая болезнь сердца. Клинические рекомендации 2024 // Российский кардиологический журнал. — 2024. — Т. 29. — № 9. — С. 6110. [Barbarash OL, Karpov YuA, Panov AV, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):6110. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6110
  9. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415–3537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177
  10. Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 — 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16(6):536–557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.002
  11. Burch RA, Siddiqui TA, Tou LC, et al. The Cost Effectiveness of Coronary CT Angiography and the Effective Utilization of CT-Fractional Flow Reserve in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023;10(1):25. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10010025
  12. Yang J, Shan D, Wang X, et al. On-Site Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Management of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The TARGET Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2023;147(18):1369–1381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063996
  13. Driessen RS, Danad I, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(2):161–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.056
  14. Haase R, Schlattmann P, Gueret P, et al. Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ. 2019;365:l1945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1945
  15. Nederland Z. Verbetersignalement Pijn op de borst (verdenking) stabiele angina pectoris. 2018. Available from: https://www. zorginstituutnederland.nl/binaries/zinl/documenten/ rapport/2018/01/31/zinnige-zorgverbetersignalement-%E2%80%98pijn-op-de-borst%E2%80%99/Rapport+pijn +op+de+borst.pdf (accessed: 22.01.2024).
  16. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(5):1759–1792. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0917-9
  17. Choi BG, Park JY, Rha SW, et al. Pre-test probability for coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain based on machine learning techniques. Int J Cardiol. 2023;385:85–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.041
  18. Gonçalves M, Roque D, de Araújo Gonçalves P, et al. Temporal trends in referral patterns for invasive coronary angiography — a multicenter 10-year analysis. Coron Artery Dis. 2021;32(3):224–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000951
  19. Neglia D, Liga R, Gimelli A, et al. Use of cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes: the EURECA Imaging registry. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(2):142–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac640
  20. Симонян М.А., Калюта Т.Ю., Генкал Е.Н., и др. Предтестовая вероятность ишемической болезни сердца как фактор оптимизации инвазивной диагностики в реальной клинической практике // Российский кардиологический журнал. — 2022. — Т. 27. — № 1. — С. 4765. [Simonyan MA, Kalyuta TYu, Genkal EN, et al. Pretest probability of coronary artery disease as a factor for optimizing invasive diagnostics in routine clinical practice. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;27(1):4765. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4765
  21. Iwata K, Ogasawara K. Assessment of the Efficiency of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for Detecting Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Suspected of Having Stable Angina. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;11(1):23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010023
  22. Boerhout CKM, Feenstra RGT, Somsen GA, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography as gatekeeper for new-onset stable angina. Neth Heart J. 2021;29(11):551–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01639-7
  23. Chang HJ, Lin FY, Gebow D, et al. Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7Pt2):1303–1312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018
  24. Douglas PS, Nanna MG, Kelsey MD, et al. Comparison of an Initial Risk-Based Testing Strategy vs Usual Testing in Stable Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PRECISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8(10):904–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2595
  25. Weir-McCall JR, Williams MC, Shah ASV, et al. National Trends in Coronary Artery Disease Imaging: Associations with Health Care Outcomes and Costs. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16(5):659–671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.10.022
  26. Першина Е.С., Шилова А.С., Нестеров А.П., и др. Клиническая и экономическая эффективность методов КТ-ангиографии пациентов среднего риска с ОКС без элевации сегмента ST в приемном отделении // Кардиология. — 2024. — Т. 64. — № 6. — С. 12–21. [Pershina ES, Shilova AS, Nesterov AP, et al. Clinical and Economic Effectiveness of CT Angiography Methods in the Emergency Department for Intermediate-Risk Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Kardiologiia. 2024;64(6):12–21. (In Russ.)] doi: https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2024.6.n2629
  27. Stocker TJ, Leipsic J, Chen MY, et al. Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Radiation Dose Exposure in Coronary CT Angiography. Radiology. 2021;300(3):701–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210245

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Frequency of detection of obstructive coronary artery disease during planned coronary angiography in patients with low and moderate pre-test probability (n = 620)

Download (71KB)
3. Fig. 2. Difference in costs when using invasive and non-invasive diagnostic strategies in patients with low and moderate pre-test probability of coronary heart disease, million rubles.

Download (153KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC



Этот сайт использует файлы cookie и сервис сбора персональных данных (Яндекс.Метрика), чтобы анализировать трафик, а также улучшать работу сайта. Нажимая кнопку «Я согласен/согласна», вы даете согласие на обработку ваших данных. Подробности — в нашей Политике конфиденциальности.