Cover Page

Cite item


Aim. Determination of the optimal diagnostic and treatment strategy in patients with scoliosis and having an anatomic shortening of the lower limb. Patients and methods. Surgical correction of scoliosis held 8 to patients with lower limb shortening caused by congenital dislocation of the hip (n = 3), anatomic shortening of the lower extremities due to the hip (n = 1), the shin bone (n = 4). Shortening before correction and fixation of scoliosis ranged from 6 to 14 cm, after surgery on the spine has been reduced by 2-4 cm achieved reduction or removal of pelvic obliquity . The second stage, after 8-12 months, performed surgery to address shortening of the lower extremity. Osteotomy of the femur with the imposition of a spoke - rod device held 4 tibial osteotomy with the imposition of external fixation device Spoke - and 4 patients and in the subsequent limb lengthening was performed by compression-distraction osteosynthesis. Results. After the dorsal stabilization and fixation of the spine scoliosis correction averaged 64% (from 76 to 27 °), the value of breast / thoracolumbar kyphosis after surgery failed to bring to the physiological (average 43 °). Misalignment of the pelvis is reduced by 67 % (from 24 to 8 °), which reduced the shortening of the lower limb by an average of 3 cm (compensation relative shortening by reducing or eliminating the distortion of the pelvis). Further compensation shortening held on the second stage of treatment, representing an osteotomy and subsequent elongation of the femur or tibia bones by transosseous compression-distraction osteosynthesis by Ilizarov. Conclusions. Multi-stage treatment reduced the degree of spinal deformity, to normalize the balance of the body, restore the function of distance without the use of orthotic devices and means of support.


About the authors

S. V. Kolesov

Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedy named after N.N. Priorov, Moscow, Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
PhD, professor, Head of the spine pathology department of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “N.N. Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Address: 10, Priorova St., Moscow, 125299, tel.: (495) 450-42-41 Russian Federation

A. N. Baklanov

Pathology of a Backbone аnd Neurosurgery Сentre, Salavat, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation

MD, orthopedist- traumatologist, head of the Center for Spine Pathology and Neurosurgery. Address: 21a, Gubkina St., Salavat, the Republic of Bashkortostan, 453250, tel.: (3476) 36-65-00 Réunion

I. A. Shavyrin

Scientific аnd Practical Centre of Medical Aid to Children Moscow, Russian Federation

MD, leading research scientist of the vertebrology and orthopedics group of the Scientific and Practical Center of Child Medical Care. Address: 38, Aviatorov St., Moscow, 119620, tel.: (499) 730-98-52 Russian Federation


  1. Rof R. Ortopediya, travmatologiya i protezirovanie = Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics. 1974; 4: 22–27.
  2. Belen’kii V.E., Popova N.Yu. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N. N. Priorova = Annals of Traumatology and Orthopedics (named in honour of N.N. Priorov). 1998; 3: 34–38.
  3. Volkov M.V. Bolezni kostei u detei. [Bone Diseases in Children]. Мoscow, 1985. p. 511.
  4. Shevtsov V.I., Popkov A.V. Operativnoe udlinenie nizhnikh konechnostei. [Surgical Lengthening of the Lower Limbs]. Мoscow, 1998. p. 192.
  5. Dadaeva O.A., Sklyarenko R.T., Travnikova N.G. Mediko-sotsial’naya ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya = Medical and Social Expertise and Rehabilitation. 2003; 3: 10–14.
  6. Norkin I.A., Shemyatenkov V.N., Zaretskov V.V., Zueva D.P., Zaretskov A.V., Rubashkin S.A. Khirurgiya pozvonochnika = Spine Surgery. 2006; 4: 8–12.
  7. Kaplunov О.А. Chreskostnyi osteosintez v kosmeticheskoi korrektsii formy i dliny nizhnikh konechnostei: optimizatsiya metodik, klinicheskaya bezopasnost' i perspektivy prakticheskogo primeneniya. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. med. nauk. [Transosseous Osteosynthesis in Cosmetic Correction of Lower Limbs Form and Lenght: Optimization of Methods, Clinical Safety and Practical Application Prospects. Author’s abstract]. Kurgan, 2006. 42 p.
  8. Lowenstein J.E., Matsumoto H., Vitale M.G., et al. Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. Spine. 2007; 32: 448–452.
  9. Cuartas E., Rasouli A., O’Brien M., et al. Use of all pedicle screw constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2009; 17: 550–561.
  10. Weiss HR, Moramarco M, Moramarco K: Risks and long-term complications of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery vs. non-surgical and natural history outcomes. Hard. Tissue 2013; 2(3):27.
  11. Mueller FJ, Gluch H: Cotrel-dubousset instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term results with an unexpected high revision rate. Scoliosis 2012; 7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-13.
  12. Dobbs M., Lenke L., Kim Y. Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws. Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery: Pediatrics. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008. p. 29.
  13. Xu R.M., Sun S.H., Ma W.H., et al. [Analysis of complications in scoliosis surgery]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2008. Vol. 21. p. 245–248. [Chinese].

Copyright (c) 1970 "Paediatrician" Publishers LLC

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies